Last updated: 2026-07-06
The March 2022 LME Short-Squeeze Crisis and Its Long Aftermath
Nickel prices nearly quadrupled in three trading days, hitting a record intraday
high of $101,365/tonne on 8 March 2022 before the London Metal Exchange suspended
trading and cancelled roughly eight hours of trades — the largest market intervention in the
exchange's 145-year history.
1. Tsingshan's short position and the squeeze mechanics
The crisis originated with Tsingshan Holding Group (THG), the world's largest nickel and stainless
steel producer, which held a large short position — roughly 80% of it in the uncleared,
opaque over-the-counter market and largely unreported to LME Clear — built as a hedge against
falling prices from its expanding nickel pig iron (NPI) and matte production
(Office of Financial Research Brief 25-01).
Russia's invasion of Ukraine on 24 February 2022 triggered fears that Russia's Nornickel —
supplier of roughly 6–10% of the world's Class 1 nickel — would face sanctions, sending
prices sharply higher and forcing Tsingshan and other short holders into an escalating chain of
margin calls
(LME News — nickel market notices).
2. The trading halt and unprecedented trade cancellation
On the morning of 8 March 2022, nickel prices surged from around $50,000/tonne to briefly touch
$101,365/tonne, an intraday move that threatened to push 12 of the LME's 45 clearing
members into default, with potential losses exceeding LME Clear's default fund by
approximately $400 million
(OFR Brief 25-01).
The LME halted trading and, controversially, cancelled all trades executed that morning —
the FIA estimated roughly $12 billion in cancelled trades, while the OFR brief notes the
cancellation eliminated an estimated $1.3 billion of matched profit-and-loss between counterparties
(FIA MarketVoice;
OFR Brief 25-01).
Tsingshan suffered paper losses reported at up to $8 billion before JPMorgan and a group of
creditor banks arranged an emergency credit facility and a commodity swap that let the company
avoid a disorderly default
(LME Nickel market history).
Trading resumed on 16 March 2022 under strict daily price-move limits, and the market hit those
limits repeatedly — down 5% on the 16th, 8% on the 17th, and 12% on the 18th — as it
searched for a new equilibrium
(Reuters, timeline of LME nickel crisis).
3. Litigation and regulatory fallout
The decision to cancel already-cleared trades drew immediate legal challenge: Elliott Associates
sued the LME for $456 million and Jane Street sued for $15.3 million, arguing the exchange acted
unlawfully in retroactively voiding executed trades
(Reuters).
The UK's Financial Conduct Authority confirmed on 3 March 2023 that it had opened a formal
enforcement investigation into LME conduct around the crisis, and the Bank of England appointed an
independent monitor to oversee LME Clear's risk management
(FCA public statement;
Reuters).
The UK High Court subsequently upheld the LME's authority to cancel trades under its rulebook's
broad "market disorder" powers, a ruling that was still being tested on appeal into 2025
(OFR Brief 25-01;
LME Nickel).
4. Reform and recovery: rebuilding a broken market
Post-crisis reforms required members to disclose large OTC nickel positions weekly, and the LME
reinstated Asian-hours trading from 20 March 2023 specifically to rebuild liquidity closer to
where Chinese and Indonesian participants trade
(FIA MarketVoice;
Reuters).
Recovery has been material: by 2024, LME nickel trading volumes were up 58.8% year-on-year, back
near pre-crisis 2021 levels, and combined LME/LME Clear pre-tax profit rose 68% to $193 million,
with average daily nickel volumes at their highest since 2015
(Reuters, "LME puts 2022 nickel crisis behind it," 13 Jan 2025).
On-warrant LME nickel inventory rebuilt from under 40,000 tonnes in May 2023 to roughly
230,000–287,550 tonnes by late 2024/2026, restoring the deliverable-stock buffer that
underpins price-discovery confidence
(Reuters;
ScarceEarth nickel market data).
The exchange has also approved six new deliverable nickel brands since the crisis — five
Chinese and one Indonesian — including PT ENICO in December 2025, Impala Nickel briquettes
in March 2026, and HUAYOUgx in April 2026, while delisting Sibanye-Stillwater's NICKEL HP brand
effective 7 April 2026
(Petromindo, LME approves PT ENICO;
Mysteel, Impala Nickel briquettes;
Huayou Group, HUAYOUgx LME listing;
LME delisting notice, NICKEL HP).
Current status (July 2026):
The LME nickel contract has structurally recovered in volume and inventory terms, but the new
Chinese and Indonesian brand approvals mean the exchange's deliverable base is shifting decisively
toward Asian-refined material, reshaping who effectively sets the reference price.
Watch: further LME brand approvals/delistings, FCA enforcement resolution,
LME Clear default-fund adequacy reviews.
Last updated: 2026-07-06
Class 1 vs. Class 2 Nickel: A Market Split in Two by Battery Demand
Class 1 nickel's share of global supply has fallen from roughly 50% in 2012 to about 20%
in 2022, even as it remains the only grade deliverable against the LME contract —
leaving an estimated 70% of the world's saleable nickel pricing off the LME benchmark entirely.
1. What the LME contract actually requires
The LME nickel contract specifies a minimum purity of 99.80%, conforming to ASTM B39-79 (2023) or
Chinese standard GB/T 6516-2010 Ni9990, traded in 6-tonne lots, and deliverable in the form of full
plate or cut cathodes, pellets, briquettes, or rounds
(LME Nickel contract specifications;
LME Special Contract Rules, nickel chemical composition).
This high-purity threshold defines "Class 1" nickel — electrolytic nickel, briquettes,
cathodes, and powders at ≥99.8% — the only grade the exchange will accept into its warehouse
network
(USGS 2019 Minerals Yearbook, nickel).
2. Class 2: the stainless-steel workhorse that dominates tonnage
"Class 2" nickel — ferronickel, nickel pig iron (NPI), and nickel oxide sinter, generally
below 99% nickel content — is not LME-deliverable but accounts for the majority of physical
nickel consumed worldwide, feeding primarily into stainless steel production
(USGS 2019 Minerals Yearbook;
Zeb Nickel, nickel grades overview).
Indonesian and Philippine laterite ore, processed through rotary kiln-electric furnace (RKEF)
routes into NPI, has become the dominant global source of this grade over the past decade, a shift
that structurally decoupled tonnage growth from the LME-priced Class 1 segment.
3. MHP and the rise of an intermediate battery feedstock
Mixed hydroxide precipitate (MHP), produced by high-pressure acid leach (HPAL) processing of
laterite ore, has emerged as a battery-grade-equivalent intermediate that is neither classic Class
1 nor Class 2: it requires a further conversion step into nickel sulphate before it can enter
battery cathode supply chains, but delivers a much higher effective nickel content and yield than
NPI
(npj Materials Sustainability, nickel supply chain review).
MHP's rapid scale-up in Indonesia is central to the market's structural shift, discussed in
Section 3.
4. Price divergence: two markets, two curves
Macquarie has estimated that Class 1 nickel's share of the global market fell from around 50% in
2012 to roughly 20% in 2022, with an estimated 70% of the world's saleable nickel now pricing at a
discount to the LME benchmark rather than at parity with it
(Argus Media, "LME nickel grapples with identity crisis," Dec 2022).
By May 2026, this had produced a visible two-tier market: LME Class 1 cash nickel traded in the
$20,000–23,000/tonne range while NPI and MHP grades traded at a discount amid an estimated
250,000-tonne surplus concentrated specifically in those non-LME grades
(Rzzro Intelligence, nickel market analysis, May 2026).
LME cash Class 1 nickel hit a 23-month high of $19,450/tonne on 28 April 2026, while the Shanghai
Metals Market benchmark for 1# cathode settled at $18,748.23/tonne on 1 June 2026 — a gap
that illustrates how Chinese domestic and LME international pricing now move as related but
distinct curves
(Critical Minerals News, nickel price tracker).
Current status (July 2026):
The LME contract remains the reference price for Class 1 metal, but it now covers a shrinking
minority of physical tonnage. The real supply-demand balance that matters for EV battery costs
increasingly plays out in the Class 2/MHP complex, priced via SMM, Fastmarkets, and bilateral
contracts rather than the LME ring. Watch: further LME Class 1 brand dilution,
MHP benchmark development, INSG grade-specific balance reporting.
Last updated: 2026-07-06
Indonesia's HPAL Revolution: Building the World's Battery-Nickel Supply Chain from Scratch
Indonesia's Weda Bay and Morowali industrial parks now host over 90,000 workers each
and tens of billions of dollars in Chinese-financed high-pressure acid leach (HPAL) capacity, built
almost entirely since the country's 2014 and 2020 raw-ore export bans forced processing onshore.
1. IMIP: the original vertically integrated template
Indonesia Morowali Industrial Park (IMIP), a joint venture between Tsingshan Holding Group
(66.25%) and PT Bintang Delapan Group (33.75%), was established in 2015 in direct response to
Indonesia's first raw nickel ore export ban, and grew into the world's largest vertically
integrated stainless-steel and nickel-processing hub, spanning roughly 5,500 hectares, employing
more than 90,000 workers, and hosting over 50 tenant companies
(Nickel Industries, Tsingshan collaboration overview).
2. IWIP/Weda Bay: the Halmahera battery-metals complex
Indonesia Weda Bay Industrial Park (IWIP), on Halmahera Island, is a joint venture of Tsingshan
(via Perlus Technology, roughly 40%), Huayou Cobalt (roughly 30%), and Zhenshi Group (roughly
30%), representing an estimated $11–13 billion of cumulative investment across more than
5,000 hectares since production began in April 2020
(Reuters, Weda Bay nickel park launch, Apr 2020;
Business & Human Rights Resource Centre, IWIP profile).
Combined, IMIP and IWIP employ well over 90,000 workers and represent the two anchor sites of
Indonesia's transformation into the world's dominant nickel-processing base
(South China Morning Post, cost of Indonesia's EV dream).
3. The HPAL build-out: PT Huafei, QMB, and the Merdeka ventures
PT Huafei Nickel Cobalt, a fourth-generation HPAL joint venture among Huayou, Tsingshan, and EVE
Energy, cost an estimated $2.3 billion and targets 120,000 tonnes of contained nickel plus 15,000
tonnes of cobalt annually, reportedly running roughly 30% above nameplate capacity
(Mysteel, IWIP site visit report).
PT QMB New Energy Materials, a GEM Co./Tsingshan consortium plant at IMIP, is one of the largest
single HPAL operations in the country. PT Merdeka Battery Materials operates a portfolio of HPAL
joint ventures including PT ESG (30,000 tonnes nickel as MHP), PT Meiming (25,000 tonnes), and PT
Sulawesi Nickel Cobalt (90,000 tonnes, targeted mid-2026), plus a CATL Brunp joint-venture HPAL
plant (60,000 tonnes) at the new Konawe Industrial Park
(Merdeka Copper Gold, Merdeka Battery Materials business overview).
4. State bank financing exposure
Indonesian state-owned banks have become deeply financially exposed to this build-out: Bank
Mandiri, BNI, BRI, Bangkok Bank, and Permata collectively lent an estimated $2.5 billion to HPAL
projects at IMIP, including $1.4 billion to Merdeka Battery Materials/Sulawesi Nickel Cobalt in
2025, $490 million to Merdeka/PT ESG in 2024, and a combined $650 million from BNI and DBS to
Nickel Industries/ENC
(Yayasan Tanah Merdeka, state bank HPAL financing report, Jan 2026).
Current status (July 2026):
Indonesia's HPAL capacity continues expanding, but a March 2026 landslide at an IMIP waste site
(Section 5) knocked an estimated 30% of the country's HPAL capacity temporarily offline, and
several plants remain under regulatory review. Watch: Ministry of Environment
permit reviews, new HPAL project financial close announcements, Konawe Industrial Park ramp-up.
Last updated: 2026-07-06
Export Controls, Quota Politics, and the Retreat of Western Nickel Mining
Indonesia's raw-ore export ban, first imposed in 2014 and reinstated in January 2020, has
been extended in principle to nickel concentrates through 2028, forcing processing
onshore — while at the same time, BHP, Wyloo, and First Quantum have suspended or closed
major Western Australian nickel operations rendered uneconomic by Indonesian supply growth.
1. Indonesia's export ban timeline and the RKAB quota system
Indonesia first banned unprocessed nickel ore exports in January 2014 to force domestic smelting
investment, briefly relaxed the rule, then reinstated a full ban on raw ore exports effective 1
January 2020, two years earlier than originally scheduled. The government has signalled its intent
to extend downstream-processing requirements to nickel concentrates by around 2028, while managing
annual mining volumes through the RKAB (Rencana Kerja dan Anggaran Biaya) quota approval system,
which sets company-level extraction ceilings and has been a recurring source of supply
uncertainty and permitting delay heading into 2026.
2. DHE-SDA export proceeds repatriation rules
Indonesia's DHE-SDA regulation (Devisa Hasil Ekspor Sumber Daya Alam) requires exporters of natural
resource commodities, including nickel products, to repatriate and, for a specified holding
period, retain a portion of export proceeds in domestic banking system accounts — a
capital-control mechanism layered on top of the physical export licensing regime that adds
compliance complexity for foreign offtakers and joint-venture partners operating in the nickel
processing parks.
3. BHP Nickel West suspension and Ravensthorpe closure
BHP announced in July 2024 that it would suspend operations across its Nickel West division in
Western Australia — including the Kwinana refinery, Kalgoorlie smelter, and Mount Keith and
Leinster mining operations — with the suspension taking effect from October 2024, directly
citing the collapse in nickel prices driven by low-cost Indonesian supply growth. First Quantum
Minerals separately placed its Ravensthorpe nickel operation into care and maintenance for the
same reason, and Andrew Forrest's Wyloo Metals suspended its Kambalda nickel concentrator, together
marking the effective retreat of a significant share of Australia's nickel mining industry from
active production.
4. Structural implications for Western supply diversification
Why it matters: the simultaneous suspension of BHP Nickel West, Ravensthorpe, and
Kambalda removed a material share of non-Indonesian, non-Chinese-owned nickel supply from the
market in the same period that Western governments and automakers were seeking to diversify battery
nickel sourcing away from Indonesia's Chinese-dominated processing base — leaving critical
minerals strategies with fewer near-term alternative supply options outside Indonesia and Russia.
Current status (July 2026):
Nickel West, Ravensthorpe, and Kambalda remain in care and maintenance, contingent on a sustained
nickel price recovery well above 2024–2025 levels before any restart is economically
justified. Watch: Australian government critical-minerals support packages for
nickel restarts, RKAB quota renewal cycles, further Indonesian downstream-processing regulation.
Last updated: 2026-07-06
Nornickel: Sanctioned in Practice Without Being Formally Banned
Nornickel itself has not been placed under direct Western sanctions, but the LME
and CME suspended acceptance of new Russian nickel, copper, and aluminium produced after 13 April
2024 — a targeted metal-origin restriction distinct from, and narrower than, the full
sanctions regimes applied to Russian oil and some other exports.
1. The 13 April 2024 LME/CME warehouse restriction
Following joint action by the U.S. and UK governments, the LME and CME announced they would no
longer accept newly produced Russian nickel, aluminium, or copper into their warehouse networks
from 13 April 2024 onward, while metal produced before that date remained tradeable and
deliverable. This created a bifurcated market: pre-13-April Russian metal continued circulating
freely through LME-registered warehouses, while post-date production had to find buyers in markets
outside the LME/CME system, primarily in China and other non-sanctioning jurisdictions.
2. Why Nornickel avoided direct sanctions
Nornickel supplies a globally significant share of the world's Class 1 nickel, palladium, and
platinum, and Western governments have historically been reluctant to sanction the company directly
given the risk of triggering a supply shock in battery and automotive catalyst markets already
strained by the 2022 LME crisis. The metal-origin warehouse restriction represented a middle path:
it discouraged fresh Russian production from entering Western exchange infrastructure without
cutting off the company's ability to sell existing inventory or contract directly with non-Western
buyers.
3. Market effects: a two-track Russian metal price
The restriction effectively created a discount market for post-April-2024 Russian nickel sold
outside LME/CME channels, while pre-restriction inventory retained full LME-deliverable value.
Chinese buyers, already the dominant counterparty for Russian metals following the 2022 sanctions
on other commodities, absorbed much of the redirected volume, reinforcing China's position as the
central clearinghouse for metal that Western exchanges will not warehouse.
Current status (July 2026):
The LME/CME post-13-April-2024 restriction remains in force; Nornickel continues to operate without
direct entity-level Western sanctions. Watch: any escalation to full sanctions
tied to broader Russia-Ukraine diplomatic developments, further OFAC or UK Treasury designations
affecting Nornickel ownership structures or trading counterparties.
Last updated: 2026-07-06
EV Battery Demand: The LFP Threat to Nickel's Growth Story
Nickel-rich cathode chemistries (NCM811, NCA) once anchored the long-term bull case for battery
nickel demand, but the rapid global share gain of nickel-free lithium iron phosphate (LFP)
batteries — led by CATL and adopted by Tesla, BYD, and other major automakers for
standard-range vehicles — has structurally capped how much of total EV cathode demand nickel
can capture.
1. NCM811 and NCA: nickel's high-energy-density case
High-nickel cathode chemistries — NCM811 (80% nickel, 10% cobalt, 10% manganese) and NCA
(nickel-cobalt-aluminium, used prominently by Panasonic for Tesla) — deliver higher energy
density per kilogram than LFP, translating into longer vehicle range for a given battery pack
weight. This made high-nickel chemistries the preferred choice for premium and long-range EV
models from automakers including Tesla (via Panasonic and LG Energy Solution cells) and various
premium German and Korean OEM platforms.
2. LFP's cost and safety advantages driving share gains
LFP batteries contain no nickel or cobalt, offer materially lower cost per kilowatt-hour, longer
cycle life, and better thermal stability than nickel-rich chemistries, though at lower energy
density. CATL, the world's largest battery maker, and BYD, which is both an automaker and battery
producer, have driven LFP's share of global EV battery deployment sharply higher through the
2020s, with LFP now dominant in China's mass-market EV segment and increasingly adopted by Tesla
for standard-range Model 3 and Model Y variants and by other global automakers seeking lower-cost
entry-level EV platforms.
3. Sourcing strategy divergence among the top cell makers
CATL, LG Energy Solution, and Panasonic have each pursued different chemistry mixes: CATL leads in
LFP volume while maintaining NCM lines for premium customers; LG Energy Solution has historically
skewed toward NCM/NCA chemistries for North American and European automaker partners including GM
and Hyundai; Panasonic remains most closely tied to NCA for its long-standing Tesla supply
relationship. This divergence means nickel demand growth is increasingly concentrated in a
narrower set of premium and long-range vehicle platforms rather than the broad EV market as a
whole.
4. Net effect on the nickel demand outlook
Why it matters: the LFP share shift is the single largest structural headwind to
the "EV supercycle" nickel demand narrative that underpinned much of the 2021–2022 price
boom. Nickel's battery demand growth has not disappeared, but it is now a function of premium and
long-range vehicle mix rather than total EV unit sales, making forecasting materially more
sensitive to automaker chemistry-mix decisions than to headline EV adoption rates.
Current status (July 2026):
LFP continues gaining global EV battery share at nickel-chemistry's expense, even as absolute
nickel battery demand still grows in tonnage terms due to overall EV volume growth.
Watch: sodium-ion battery commercialization as a further LFP-adjacent threat,
next-generation high-nickel low-cobalt chemistry announcements from CATL, LG, and Panasonic.
Last updated: 2026-07-06
ESG Scrutiny: The Environmental Cost of Indonesia's Nickel Boom
A March 2026 landslide at an IMIP waste site killed one worker and forced roughly 30% of
Indonesia's HPAL capacity temporarily offline, intensifying scrutiny of coal-powered smelting,
deep-sea tailings disposal, and Halmahera deforestation tied to the country's nickel processing
expansion.
1. The March 2026 IMIP landslide and production halt
In March 2026, a landslide at a waste-disposal site within the Indonesia Morowali Industrial Park
killed at least one worker and prompted reports that four smelters — PT QMB New Energy
Materials, Green Eco Nickel, Meiming New Energy, and ESG New Energy — had halted production,
though IMIP management publicly denied that all four plants had stopped, stating some of the named
facilities were still under construction rather than operating
(Bisnis Indonesia, IMIP landslide reporting, Mar 2026;
Petromindo, IMIP denial statement).
Indonesia's Ministry of Environment opened a review of PT QMB's environmental permit following the
incident
(Bisnis Indonesia).
The landslide followed a separate 2023 IMIP smelter explosion that killed at least 21 workers,
adding to a pattern of serious safety incidents at the park
(Bisnis Indonesia).
2. Coal-powered captive smelting and emissions intensity
Most of Indonesia's nickel processing parks, including IMIP and IWIP, rely on dedicated
"captive" coal-fired power plants built specifically to supply the smelters rather than drawing
from a decarbonizing national grid, giving Indonesian NPI and HPAL nickel a materially higher
carbon footprint per tonne than nickel refined using renewable or lower-carbon grid power —
a growing concern for automakers and battery makers facing EU Battery Regulation carbon-footprint
disclosure requirements.
3. Deep-sea tailings disposal (DSTP)
Several Indonesian nickel operations, including Harita Group's Obi Island operations, use deep-sea
tailings placement to dispose of HPAL processing waste, discharging tailings through pipelines into
ocean waters at depth rather than using land-based tailings storage facilities — a practice
banned or heavily restricted in most Western mining jurisdictions due to concerns about marine
ecosystem damage, heavy-metal dispersion, and the difficulty of monitoring or remediating deep-ocean
waste once discharged
(South China Morning Post, cost of Indonesia's EV dream).
4. Halmahera deforestation and land-rights concerns
Nickel mining and smelter-park expansion on Halmahera Island, the location of IWIP/Weda Bay, has
been linked to significant deforestation and land-grabbing affecting indigenous and local
communities, including the Indigenous Hongana Manyawa people who maintain traditional forest-based
livelihoods in the concession areas
(Business & Human Rights Resource Centre, IWIP profile;
South China Morning Post).
Reporting has documented pollution complaints from surrounding communities and disputes over
customary land rights as industrial park boundaries expanded to accommodate new HPAL and RKEF
capacity.
Current status (July 2026):
Environmental and safety incidents at IMIP and IWIP continue to draw international scrutiny even as
production capacity keeps expanding; no comprehensive Indonesian regulatory response equivalent to
Western deep-sea tailings bans has been adopted. Watch: EU Battery Regulation
carbon-footprint rule implementation and its treatment of Indonesian coal-powered nickel, further
Ministry of Environment permit actions following the 2026 landslide.
Last updated: 2026-07-06
Recycling and Secondary Supply: Black Mass, Battery Recyclers, and the Post-Li-Cycle Landscape
Battery recycling was supposed to be a meaningful secondary nickel source by the mid-2020s, but
the sector's most prominent pure-play recycler, Li-Cycle, filed for bankruptcy protection before
Glencore stepped in to acquire its key assets, underscoring how immature and capital-intensive
black-mass recycling economics remain relative to primary supply.
1. Black mass as the intermediate recycling product
End-of-life lithium-ion batteries are typically first shredded and processed into "black mass," an
intermediate powder containing recoverable nickel, cobalt, lithium, and manganese, which is then
sent to hydrometallurgical or pyrometallurgical refiners for final metal recovery. Global black
mass trade has grown substantially as EV battery volumes reaching end-of-life increase, but the
refining step — converting black mass back into battery-grade nickel sulphate —
remains concentrated among a small number of specialized processors.
2. Li-Cycle's collapse and Glencore's acquisition
Li-Cycle, once positioned as North America's leading lithium-ion battery recycler with a network of
"Spoke" shredding facilities feeding a planned central "Hub" refinery in Rochester, New York,
encountered severe cost overruns and financing difficulties at the Hub project, ultimately filing
for insolvency protection. Glencore, which had been a strategic investor and offtake partner,
moved to acquire key Li-Cycle assets, consolidating control over one of the few scaled
Western black-mass processing platforms rather than allowing the recycling capacity to disappear
entirely from the market.
3. Redwood Materials and the vertically integrated alternative
Redwood Materials, founded by former Tesla executive JB Straubel, has pursued a more vertically
integrated approach, combining battery collection, black-mass processing, and cathode-material
production at its Nevada facility, with partnerships spanning Panasonic, Ford, and Toyota. Redwood's
strategy of producing battery-grade nickel and cobalt sulphate directly for re-sale into new
cathode production, rather than selling black mass onward to third-party refiners, reflects the
industry's broader recognition that capturing margin at the refining step is essential to making
battery recycling economically viable.
4. USGS recycling-rate context
USGS Mineral Commodity Summaries data situates secondary (recycled) nickel as a meaningful but
still minority contributor to total U.S. and global apparent nickel supply, with stainless-steel
scrap remaining the single largest recycling stream by volume — substantially larger than
battery-derived black mass recycling, which remains an early-stage, rapidly scaling but still
small contributor to overall secondary nickel supply as of the mid-2020s
(USGS Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026, nickel chapter).
Current status (July 2026):
Battery recycling capacity is consolidating around better-capitalized players (Glencore/Li-Cycle
assets, Redwood Materials) after the first wave of pure-play recyclers struggled with financing.
Watch: Redwood Materials capacity expansion announcements, further black-mass
trade-flow data from China and South Korea, EU Battery Regulation recycled-content mandates coming
into force later this decade.
Last updated: 2026-07-06
Financialisation: The LME's Fight to Remain the Reference Price
With LME nickel trading volumes back near pre-crisis levels but the exchange's deliverable brand
list increasingly dominated by Chinese and Indonesian producers, the Shanghai Futures Exchange's
push to internationalize its own nickel contract and the rise of alternative price assessments
(SMM, Fastmarkets) are together testing whether the LME can keep functioning as the world's single
reference price for nickel.
1. LME liquidity recovery, but a changed participant base
As detailed in Section 1, LME nickel volumes rose 58.8% in 2024 and on-warrant inventory rebuilt
substantially from its 2023 lows
(Reuters, 13 Jan 2025).
However, much of that recovered liquidity and warehouse stock is increasingly composed of newly
approved Chinese and Indonesian brands rather than the historically dominant Western and Russian
production base, changing the underlying supply composition behind the benchmark even as trading
activity itself has normalized.
2. SHFE's internationalization push
The Shanghai Futures Exchange has continued expanding access for international participants to its
own nickel futures contract, reflecting China's ambition to establish a China-based reference price
that better reflects the country's dominant position in Class 2/NPI and HPAL-derived nickel supply,
rather than relying on a London benchmark built around a shrinking Class 1 segment. This
internationalization effort accelerated through 2025 and into 2026 as Chinese and Indonesian output
continued to represent an ever-larger share of global nickel units.
3. SMM and Fastmarkets as de facto Class 2/MHP benchmarks
In the absence of a mature exchange-traded contract for NPI or MHP, price reporting agencies
including Shanghai Metals Market (SMM) and Fastmarkets have become the de facto reference points
for these grades, publishing regular assessments that increasingly diverge from LME Class 1 pricing,
as illustrated by the gap between LME cash nickel ($19,450/tonne, 28 April 2026) and SMM's 1#
cathode assessment ($18,748.23/tonne, 1 June 2026)
(Critical Minerals News, nickel price tracker).
4. INSG's role as neutral market-balance arbiter
The International Nickel Study Group (INSG) continues to publish the most widely cited independent
assessment of global primary nickel supply, demand, and the resulting market balance, providing a
common reference point that both LME- and SHFE-oriented market participants rely on even as the
exchanges themselves diverge in participant base and contract design.
Current status (July 2026):
No single exchange currently offers a fully representative, liquid contract spanning both Class 1
and Class 2/MHP grades; the market operates on a fragmented set of reference prices (LME, SHFE, SMM,
Fastmarkets) that together approximate, but do not unify, the true global nickel price.
Watch: SHFE international-participant volume growth, any LME move to introduce a
Class 2 or MHP-linked contract, further INSG market-balance revisions.
Indonesia's dominance of global nickel mine production is now overwhelming, and USGS Mineral
Commodity Summaries 2026 data shows the country's share continuing to grow even as INSG projects a
sharp swing in the global market balance for 2026.
1. Global reserves by country (USGS MCS 2026)
| Country | Reserves (million tonnes contained Ni) |
| Indonesia | Largest global reserve base |
| Australia | Second-largest |
| Brazil | Significant laterite reserves |
| Russia | Major sulphide reserve base |
| Philippines | Significant laterite reserves |
Source: USGS Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026, nickel chapter.
Indonesia holds the largest identified global nickel reserve base, a position that has directly
enabled its rise to dominance in mine production over the past decade.
2. Mine production concentration
Indonesia accounts for the largest share of global mined nickel production by a wide margin, with
the Philippines, Russia, New Caledonia, and Australia making up most of the remainder. This
concentration has intensified since Indonesia's export bans forced ore processing onshore, drawing
in the Chinese-financed RKEF and HPAL capacity detailed in Section 3
(USGS MCS 2026).
3. The 2025–2026 swing from surplus to deficit
The International Nickel Study Group's market-balance data shows a marked shift from a global
primary nickel surplus in recent years toward a forecast tightening or deficit condition heading
into 2026, driven by the combination of Western mine suspensions (Section 4), episodic Indonesian
HPAL disruptions (Section 7), and continued underlying demand growth from stainless steel and
battery applications
(
International Nickel Study Group).
4. U.S. import reliance and price context
The United States remains substantially import-reliant for primary nickel, sourcing material from
Canada, Indonesia (indirectly via processed products), and other suppliers, with USGS tracking
recycling's contribution to total apparent U.S. nickel supply as a meaningful but secondary
component alongside primary imports
(USGS MCS 2026).
Combined with the Class 1/Class 2 price divergence in Section 2 and the LME-vs-SHFE benchmark
fragmentation in Section 9, the overall picture is a market whose headline LME price increasingly
understates the tightness building in the specific grades and geographies that matter most for
battery and defense-relevant supply chains.
Current status (July 2026):
Indonesia's reserve and production dominance continues to deepen; INSG's 2026 balance forecast points
toward tightening after several years of surplus. Watch: USGS MCS 2027 nickel
chapter (due February 2027), INSG's next quarterly balance update, any acceleration in Western mine
restarts contingent on price recovery.
Because Indonesia controls roughly half of world nickel mine output, the way Jakarta prices its own ore
is now a de facto reference for the entire industry. Every tonne of Indonesian nickel ore, MHP, MSP, NPI,
ferronickel, matte or refined ingot that changes hands domestically must be valued at or above the state's
HPM (Harga Patokan Mineral)
floor for royalty, iuran produksi and export-levy purposes. Since 15 April 2026 the governing decree
is
KEPMEN ESDM 144.K/MB.01/MEM.B/2026,
which replaces the previous 268/2025 regime and materially expands what counts as monetisable value in a
laterite orebody.
1. The 2026 nickel-ore HPM formula
Bijih Nikel HPM (USD per wet metric tonne):
HPM = [ (%Ni × CFNi × HMANi) +
(%Fe × CFFe × HMAIron Ore × 100) +
(%Co × CFCo × HMACobalt) +
(%Cr × CFCr × HMAChrome Ore × 100) ] × (1 − MC)
Where MC = moisture content and
CF (Corrective Factor)
depends on grade:
- CFNi = 30% at 1.6% Ni base grade, sliding ±1% for every 0.1% deviation in nickel content;
- CFFe = 30% only if %Fe ≤ 35% (above the threshold iron is not monetised);
- CFCo = 30% only if %Co ≥ 0.05%;
- CFCr = 10% flat, no grade threshold.
2. What actually changed vs KEPMEN 268/2025
- The base nickel-ore corrective factor rises from 17% to 30% at 1.6% Ni — roughly doubling headline royalty on saprolite ore before any associated-mineral adjustment.
- Fe, Co and Cr in laterite ore are now monetised inside the same HPM formula; under 268/2025 they were ignored, effectively subsidising integrated smelters.
- The unit of measurement switches from USD/DMT to USD/WMT and the explicit (1 − MC) moisture multiplier makes the wet-to-dry translation transparent for the first time.
- Bauxite ore adds an R-SiO2 deduction (−1 USD/DMT per +0.5% above the 2% reactive-silica cap, capped at −3.5 USD/DMT).
3. Downstream product HPMs
| Product | HPM Formula | Effective CF |
| Nickel ingot (Class 1) | = HMANi (pass-through) | 100% |
| Feronikel (FeNi) | (%Ni × HMANi) × 95% | 95% |
| NPI (Nickel Pig Iron) | (%Ni × HMANi) × 85% | 85% |
| Nickel-matte | 78% × (%Ni + %Co) × HMANi | 78% |
| MHP (mixed hydroxide) | (%Ni × HMANi × 60%) + (%Co × HMACo × 100%) | 60% Ni + 100% Co |
| MSP (mixed sulphide) | (%Ni × HMANi × 60%) + (%Co × HMACo × 30%) | 60% Ni + 30% Co |
| NMS (nickel-manganese-sulphate) | NMS-specific formula, Lampiran I 144/2026 | — |
Full formulas are in Lampiran I of
KEPMEN ESDM 144.K/MB.01/MEM.B/2026 (JDIH ESDM).
4. Where the HMA inputs come from
The
HMA (Harga Mineral Acuan)
that feeds the HPM formula is republished by
Kementerian ESDM
twice a month at
minerba.esdm.go.id/harga_acuan
(Periode Pertama and Periode Kedua, effective since 26 February 2025 — it was monthly before). Twelve metals
are covered: nickel, cobalt, lead, zinc, aluminium, copper, gold, silver, manganese, iron ore
(laterite/hematite/magnetite), chromium ore and titanium concentrate.
5. Why it matters for global nickel pricing
For the largest producer in the world, HPM is where royalty economics meets export policy. Every 10 USD/t
change in HMANi flows straight into ore, MHP, NPI and matte HPMs, changing the state's take on
every downstream product line simultaneously.
Fastmarkets
has explicitly clarified that its Indonesian nickel-ore assessments now include HPM alongside spot
market data — making the government-set formula a real benchmark input, not just a fiscal instrument.
Physical trades typically clear at HPM plus a market premium; HPM sets the floor for state revenue, not the
ceiling for trade.
Current status (July 2026):
KEPMEN 144/2026 has been in force for three months. Traders and integrated smelter groups are still adapting
pricing sheets to include Fe/Co/Cr credits and the WMT↔DMT conversion; expect further ministerial
clarifications during 2026–2027. TSM tracks the HMA table live at
/calculators/hpm-nickel-ore/. Indonesia is only one of nine major fiscal regimes — compare it side-by-side with India (IBM ASP), Chile (RIOMA), the Philippines (MGB), DRC (ARECOMS) and five others at
/pricing-regimes/.
Watch: next Periode Kedua HMA release, any KEPMEN amendment altering CF
thresholds, Fastmarkets' quarterly methodology reviews.