Prices
No single exchange-settled price exists for bismuth. Trade settles over-the-counter against benchmarks published by independent price-reporting agencies. We do not republish those numbers — consult the publishers directly:
Markets, Production & Financial Context
Cross-domain links to calculators, glossary, and public peer tickersBismuth (Bi) sits at the intersection of three professional domains. Each card below links to the relevant TSM Hub tools and references — designed for sell-side analysts, buy-side PMs, M&A bankers, project-finance teams, IR, and finance professors & students.
- Benchmark publishers: Spot / OTC (see Prices table)
- Unit Price calculator — convert price across units (USD/MT ↔ USD/lb ↔ USD/troy oz)
- Purity calculator · Freight (Incoterms) · TCO Pro
- Top country (USGS MCS 2026): China (14,000 metric tons/yr)
- Recovery & Yield calculator — model heap-leach / flotation recovery
- AISC Builder — WGC 2013 3-layer all-in sustaining cost
- NPV / IRR Project Economics — 8-input DCF with 11 industry presets
- Pure-play tickers (2 of 2): NTI600497.SHNTI = NeoTerra Technologies (TSXV) · 600497.SH = Chihong Zinc & Germanium (Bi byproduct) (SSE)
- Glossary — Financial / Investing terms (42 terms: NPV, IRR, AISC, EV/EBITDA, FCF, royalty, streaming, hedging, …)
- Tickers are public identifiers — look up live financials on your broker or the exchange site directly. No data hosted here.
About Bismuth
Editorial overviewWhat is bismuth?
How bismuth is priced
Where bismuth comes from
Who produces bismuth
What bismuth is used for
Key facts about bismuth supply
- USGS MCS 2026: world bismuth production was 16,000 tons in 2025, and China supplied 88% of that total. USGS MCS 2026 Bismuth
- USGS MCS 2026: U.S. net import reliance for bismuth was 92% in 2021, 97% in 2022, 94% in 2023, 90% in 2024, and 92% in 2025e. USGS MCS 2026 Bismuth
- USGS MCS 2026: recycled bismuth-containing alloy scrap was estimated to supply up to 10% of U.S. bismuth apparent consumption in 2021–25. USGS MCS 2026 Bismuth
- USGS MCS 2026: reserves and resources were generally not reported at a mine or country level, so a reserve-to-production cover ratio is not published for bismuth. USGS MCS 2026 Bismuth
- USGS MCS 2026: bismuth is most often a byproduct of lead ore processing, with additional byproduct or coproduct output from tungsten and zinc ore processing in some countries. USGS MCS 2026 Bismuth
Sources: USGS MCS 2026 Bismuth
Deep Dive
Expert analysis of Bismuth markets, supply chains and structure — curated from primary sources.
China Export Controls: MOFCOM Adds Bismuth to the 2025 Retaliation List
On 4 February 2025, China's Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM) and the General Administration of Customs (GAC) jointly issued Announcement No. 10 of 2025, imposing export-licensing controls on items related to tungsten, tellurium, bismuth, molybdenum, and indium. The bismuth-specific controls cover metallic bismuth and bismuth products (customs code 8106101091 and related codes), bismuth germanate, triphenyl bismuth, and tri-p-ethoxyphenyl bismuth, plus associated production technology (Shanghai Metals Market translation of the MOFCOM text). The measure took effect immediately upon publication, with no phase-in period.
MOFCOM explicitly tied the timing to trade retaliation: China announced plans for the controls in early February 2025 in direct response to the 10% tariff the United States imposed on Chinese imports that same month (Reuters, 4 Feb 2025). At a MOFCOM press briefing, spokesperson He Yongqian stated the controlled items have “both military and civilian applications” and that “downstream products have high risks of military use,” while affirming that “the Chinese government will approve applications for export licenses that comply with the relevant regulations” (MOFCOM press conference, 6 Feb 2025).
This is a separate, standalone control distinct from the antimony/gallium/germanium restrictions under 2024 Announcement No. 46. Bismuth was not included in the December 2024 antimony package; it was added two months later, in February 2025, as part of a five-metal basket (W, Te, Bi, Mo, In) explicitly linked to the tariff dispute rather than to the earlier national-security dual-use rationale used for antimony (USGS MCS 2026, bismuth chapter).
Why it matters: the United States is 92% net import reliant on bismuth, with China supplying 56% of U.S. import sources (2021–24 average) and the Republic of Korea and Germany supplying most of the rest — but Korean and German bismuth chemical production itself depends on Chinese refined metal feedstock (USGS MCS 2026). Bismuth is the active ingredient in Pepto-Bismol-type stomach remedies, a lead-free solder and machining-alloy additive, and a fire-suppression trigger metal — a small, overlooked market that had no Western stockpile or alternate refining base when the controls hit.
Price Surge: From $5.30/lb to a Record $34/lb
| Date | Price ($/lb, Rotterdam in-warehouse) | Trigger |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 2024 | $3.89 | Pre-surge baseline |
| Oct 2024 | $6.29 | Tight supply, rising solar/pharma demand |
| 2024 average | $5.30 | +30% vs 2023; highest annual average since 2018 |
| Late Jan 2025 | ~$6 (Europe) | Pre-control baseline |
| Jan 2025 | $5.96 (monthly avg) | Baseline before MOFCOM 2025/10 |
| 4 Feb 2025 | — | MOFCOM Announcement No. 10/2025 effective |
| 19 Mar 2025 | $40/lb Europe; $55/lb U.S. (spot) | Physical shortage, Reuters reported "all-time high" |
| Mar 2025 | $34.22 (monthly avg, record) | Peak of the 2025 spike |
| Oct 2025 | $17.50 (monthly avg) | Partial retracement |
| 2025 average | $20.00 | Highest annual average on record, ~4x 2024 |
Reuters reported that European spot bismuth “jumped to $40 a lb..., an all-time high, up from $6 per lb in late January, a more than six-fold rise,” while “in the United States, bismuth prices are even higher – at $55 a lb compared with $6.5–$7 before China's export curbs,” with traders attributing the extra U.S. premium to the added effect of Trump-administration tariffs on Chinese goods (Reuters, 19 Mar 2025). USGS attributes the record $34.22/lb monthly peak directly to “China issuing export controls on bismuth in response to the United States imposing 10% import tariffs on Chinese goods in February” (USGS MCS 2026).
The physical impact showed up in trade data: U.S. bismuth metal imports from China (Harmonized System code 8106) fell 40% to an estimated 460 tons in 2025, down from 760 tons in 2024 (USGS MCS 2026). Chinese domestic 99.99%-purity bismuth reportedly traded around ¥100,000–110,000/tonne (roughly $13,800–$15,200/tonne, or $6.25–$6.90/lb) in early 2025 even as Western spot markets spiked far higher, reflecting the widening gap between China's internal price and the scarcity premium paid by import-dependent buyers outside China (Accio market data compilation, 2026).
The US Response: First National Defense Stockpile Bismuth Buy Since 1997
20 March 2025 — President Trump signs Executive Order 14241, "Immediate Measures to Increase American Mineral Production", delegating Defense Production Act Title III (Section 303) authority to the Secretary of Defense for domestic mineral production, including critical minerals such as bismuth (Congressional Research Service, IN12540).
23 May 2025 — A presidential memorandum under DPA Section 303 waives standard statutory procedural requirements for supply chains tied to "munitions, missiles and associated equipment, and minerals," explicitly citing critical minerals as defined at 30 U.S.C. §1606(a)(3), which speeds Pentagon capital deployment into bismuth and related metals (Federal Register, 4 Jun 2025).
27 August 2025 — The DLA Strategic Materials Directorate issues Request for Proposal SP8000-25-R-0017 to acquire up to 5,167,272 lb (2,344 t) of 99.99%-purity (4N) commercial-grade bismuth metal in slab or ingot form over a five-year IDIQ contract, minimum guaranteed value $3 million, ceiling $65 million, deliveries to the DLA Hawthorne Army Depot in Nevada. Annual purchase quantities decline from 1.23 million lb in Year 1 to 854,000 lb in Year 5. All production, sampling, and testing must occur within the continental United States (HigherGov federal contract record, SP8000-25-R-0017; Argus Media, 29 Aug 2025).
15 September 2025 — Reuters confirms the DLA "is set to acquire over 5 million pounds" of bismuth for the stockpile, noting the material "has not been part of the national stockpile for nearly thirty years" and citing DLA's stated goal to "mitigate risk of [disruption] in the bismuth supply chain" for defense uses, particularly lead-mimicking ammunition alloys (Reuters, 15 Sep 2025).
19 December 2025 — DLA issues a follow-on solicitation, SP8000-26-R-0009, for up to 79,380 lb of additional 99.99% bismuth ingot/slab, continuing the stockpile build-out into FY2026 (Gov Contract Finder, SP8000-26-R-0009).
Why it matters: the Pentagon's FY2026 DPA Title III budget justification lists bismuth explicitly among the minerals targeted for domestic supply-chain investment, alongside arsenic, gallium, germanium, graphite, hafnium, indium, and rare earths, "to alleviate the Department's reliance on foreign markets" (Department of War, DPAP FY2026 Budget Justification). Unlike antimony or gallium, there is no dedicated U.S. primary bismuth mine or smelter project under construction; the DLA program is a pure stockpile-buy strategy, not a production-buildout strategy, because the U.S. ceased primary bismuth refining in 1997 and has no active domestic deposit large enough to support one (USGS MCS 2026).
Defense & strategic uses — bismuth as the lead substitute the Pentagon cannot yet replace
Sources: USGS · DLA · NASA · USITC · peer-reviewed radiology literatureBismuth's defense value comes almost entirely from one property: it is the closest nontoxic chemical and physical analog to lead, with a similarly high atomic number (83) and density (9.78 g/cm³), but without lead's toxicity. Per USGS MCS 2026, bismuth's principal metallurgical role is as "a nontoxic replacement for lead in brass, free-machining aluminum alloys and steels, and solders."
1. Lead-mimicking ammunition and munitions components
DLA's own solicitation language states that bismuth metal "is utilized in various sectors, including metallurgy and defense, particularly in some types of ammunition, as it can replicate the properties of lead" (Reuters, 15 Sep 2025, citing the DLA statement of work). Bismuth-based non-toxic shot has been developed as an environmentally compliant substitute for lead shot and bullet cores where lead-toxicity regulation restricts lead ammunition use; academic testing has evaluated bismuth-jacketed rounds as a "green substitute for lead" in mainstream calibers (University of South Florida thesis on bismuth ammunition, 2015).
2. Lead-free solder for military electronics
Bismuth is a core alloying element in lead-free solders used across military and aerospace electronics assembly. NASA's Lead-Free Solder Body of Knowledge notes that "adding up to 5% bismuth may improve reliability" in tin-based lead-free solder joints and documents bismuth's role in tin-whisker mitigation and joint microstructure control (NASA NEPP Lead-Free Solder Body of Knowledge). The Australian Defence Science and Technology Organisation's investigation into lead-free solder for defense applications found bismuth "lowers the melting temperature" and "provides higher tensile strength" in solder alloys, while flagging that no MIL-STD currently exists for a lead-free solder formally qualified for military use — underscoring that bismuth solder adoption in defense systems is still in transition rather than settled doctrine (DSTO Technical Note 0970).
3. Free-machining alloys for precision-machined military hardware
Bismuth additions of typically under 0.5% by weight enable "free-machining" steels, brasses, and aluminum alloys used in precision-machined components, replacing lead as the chip-breaking agent. The U.S. International Trade Commission has separately investigated antidumping cases specifically covering "hot-rolled lead and bismuth carbon steel products," reflecting bismuth's established role as a lead-substitute machinability additive in structural and mechanical steel supply chains that feed defense manufacturing (USITC Publication 2611). The lead-free requirement was reinforced domestically after the U.S. Safe Drinking Water Act's "lead-free" threshold was tightened in 2014 from 8% to 0.25% maximum lead content, pushing bismuth further into plumbing and fitting alloys used across military installations (USGS MCS 2026).
4. Fusible alloys for fire safety and ordnance-adjacent applications
Bismuth's low melting point (271°C) makes it a core component of fusible alloys used as "a triggering mechanism for fire sprinklers," as temporary fillers in metal-forming and tube bending, and as plugs for abandoned wells — applications relevant to shipboard and installation fire-suppression systems and precision tooling (USGS MCS 2026).
5. Radiation shielding for medical and field applications
Bismuth and tungsten-bismuth composites are increasingly studied as lightweight, nontoxic alternatives to lead radiation shielding. A 2026 clinical study found triple-layer tungsten-bismuth shielding sheets achieved "over 98% attenuation at key anatomical sites and over 99% at high-exposure zones" during fluoroscopy-guided procedures, at "less than 5% of conventional lead-acrylic barrier" cost (Journal of Thoracic Disease, 26 Feb 2026). Bismuth's high atomic number (83) and density give it strong X-ray and gamma attenuation properties without lead's toxicity, supporting its use in patient breast/gonadal shields and field-deployable radiation protection (Radiation Physics and Chemistry review, 2024).
6. Pharmaceutical stockpile relevance: bismuth subsalicylate
Bismuth subsalicylate is the active ingredient in over-the-counter antidiarrheal and gastrointestinal remedies (branded as Pepto-Bismol and generics) and in treatments for burns and stomach ulcers (USGS MCS 2026). 5N Plus states it supplies "over 70% of the world's bismuth chemicals" for pharmaceutical and healthcare applications from its FDA-approved, GMP-certified Lübeck, Germany facility (5N Plus, 2025 Forced Labour Report). This pharmaceutical supply chain, though not classically "defense," was directly disrupted by the 2025 price spike and is treated by USGS and industry press as a supply-security concern given the near-total China dependency for feedstock metal.
Trade flows — how the February 2025 controls reshaped U.S. bismuth sourcing
Sources: USGS · World Bank WITS/UN Comtrade · Reuters · NAMBefore the 2025 controls, the United States sourced bismuth overwhelmingly from China, both directly and indirectly through Korean and German intermediaries who themselves depend on Chinese-refined metal. Per USGS MCS 2026, U.S. import sources for 2021–2024 were China 56%, Republic of Korea 22%, Germany 13%, and other sources 9% — a marked shift from the 2018 pattern of China 60%, Korea 12%, Mexico 8%, Belgium 6% (USGS 2018 Minerals Yearbook, bismuth).
U.S. import volumes and reliance, 2020–2025
| Year | U.S. imports, metal/alloys/scrap (tonnes) | Net import reliance | Average price ($/lb) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 1,650 | 93% | $2.73 |
| 2021 | 1,980 | 92% | $3.74 |
| 2022 | 3,080 | 97% | $3.90 |
| 2023 | 1,840 | 94% | $4.08 |
| 2024 | 1,800 | 90% | $5.30–$5.40 |
| 2025e | 1,500 | 92% | $20.00 |
Source: USGS MCS 2025 and USGS MCS 2026 bismuth chapters. U.S. bismuth metal imports specifically from China fell 40% to an estimated 460 tons in 2025, down from 760 tons in 2024, directly reflecting the effect of MOFCOM licensing on shipment volumes even though total U.S. import tonnage held roughly steady, implying substitution toward Korean, German, and other third-country supply (USGS MCS 2026).
Country-level trade snapshot (2024, U.S. imports of bismuth & articles, HS 8106)
| Rank | Origin | Value (US$000) | Volume (kg) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Republic of Korea | 8,413.9 | 787,520 |
| 2 | China | 7,468.7 | 758,449 |
| 3 | Mexico | 1,676.8 | 25,827 |
| 4 | Japan | 1,187.7 | 107,408 |
| 5 | Germany | 1,002.8 | 65,610 |
Source: World Bank WITS, UN Comtrade data, HS 810600, 2024. Total 2024 U.S. imports under this code were valued at approximately $20.5 million. Notably, by value, Korea narrowly exceeded China as the top single origin in 2024 — a reflection of Korea's byproduct bismuth recovery from zinc smelting and its role as a refining and re-export hub for material of ultimately Chinese origin.
Global production concentration, 2023–2025
| Country | 2023 (t) | 2024 (t) | 2025e (t) |
|---|---|---|---|
| China | 13,300 | 14,000 | 14,000 |
| Republic of Korea | 1,000 | 1,000 | 1,000 |
| Laos | 1,150 | 749 | 500 |
| Kazakhstan | 180 | 180 | 180 |
| Japan | 500 | 500 | 500 |
| Bulgaria | 46 | 48 | 50 |
| Bolivia | 68 | 50 | 50 |
| World total | 16,200 | 16,300 | 16,000 |
Source: USGS MCS 2026. China's share of world production rose from roughly 80–82% in 2023–2024 to 88% in 2025, as Laos's byproduct output (recovered from tungsten and other ore processing at operations such as the Sepon mine complex) fell by roughly a third year-on-year, further concentrating global supply in China rather than diversifying it (USGS MCS 2026; Sepon mine operations newsletter).
The National Association of Manufacturers' March 2026 comment to USTR on critical minerals flagged bismuth explicitly as a target of "economic coercion," noting "China imposes export controls on bismuth, indium, tellurium and tungsten" and that "China controls 88% of worldwide production for bismuth. U.S. imports primarily from China (56%), and prices have risen with export controls imposed in response to U.S.-issued tariffs on Chinese goods" (National Association of Manufacturers, USTR comment, 19 Mar 2026).
Timeline 2020–2026 — bismuth's journey from overlooked byproduct to stockpiled strategic metal
Sources: USGS · MOFCOM · Reuters · DLA · White House · Federal RegisterBismuth's re-emergence as a strategic material happened almost entirely within a 15-month window in 2024–2025, driven by tariff retaliation rather than a long-planned national-security rationale. Each entry links to the primary record.
| Date | Event | Primary source |
|---|---|---|
| 2020–2023 | Bismuth trades quietly in the $2.73–$4.08/lb range with U.S. net import reliance of 92–97%; China supplies roughly two-thirds of import sources. No Western government treats it as a stockpile priority. | USGS MCS 2025 |
| 16 Mar 2023 | European Commission's Critical Raw Materials Act proposal, COM(2023) 160 final, lists bismuth as a Strategic Raw Material in Annex I. | European Commission COM(2023) 160 |
| 2024 (full year) | Average bismuth price rises to $5.30/lb, a 30% increase over 2023 and the highest annual average since 2018; monthly Rotterdam prices climb from $3.89/lb in January to $6.29/lb in October. | USGS MCS 2025 |
| 3 Dec 2024 | MOFCOM Announcement No. 46/2024 bans antimony, gallium, and germanium exports to the U.S. — bismuth is notably absent from this package, remaining uncontrolled for two more months. | Reuters, 3 Dec 2024 |
| 4 Feb 2025 | MOFCOM and GAC jointly issue Announcement No. 10 of 2025, imposing export-licensing controls on tungsten, tellurium, bismuth, molybdenum, and indium, effective immediately, in response to new U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods. | MOFCOM Announcement No. 10/2025 |
| Feb 2025 | Chinese bismuth exports collapse to an estimated 458 tonnes for the month, far below the prior monthly average of roughly 1,000 tonnes, as exporters await licenses. | USGS Mineral Commodity Summaries 2025 — Bismuth |
| 20 Mar 2025 | President Trump signs Executive Order 14241, delegating DPA Title III authority to the Secretary of Defense to accelerate domestic mineral production, covering critical minerals including bismuth. | White House, EO 14241 |
| 19 Mar 2025 | Reuters reports European spot bismuth at $40/lb (up from $6/lb in late January) and U.S. spot at $55/lb, calling both levels all-time highs. | Reuters, 19 Mar 2025 |
| Mar 2025 | USGS-tracked Rotterdam monthly average price peaks at a record $34.22/lb, the highest monthly average on record for bismuth. | USGS MCS 2026 |
| 23 May 2025 | Presidential memorandum waives standard DPA Section 303 procedural requirements for munitions, missiles, and critical-mineral supply chains, easing the path for future bismuth-related procurement. | Federal Register, 4 Jun 2025 |
| 27 Aug 2025 | DLA Strategic Materials issues solicitation SP8000-25-R-0017 seeking up to 5,167,272 lb of 99.99% bismuth metal for the National Defense Stockpile — the first bismuth acquisition since 1997. | HigherGov, SP8000-25-R-0017 |
| 15 Sep 2025 | Reuters confirms the DLA bismuth stockpile tender, describing it as ending nearly 30 years without a bismuth reserve. | Reuters, 15 Sep 2025 |
| Oct 2025 | Rotterdam monthly average price falls to $17.50/lb, a partial retracement from the March peak but still roughly 3x the pre-2025 baseline; full-year 2025 average settles at $20/lb. | USGS MCS 2026 |
| 9 Nov 2025 | MOFCOM suspends part of Announcement No. 46/2024 (antimony/gallium/germanium) toward the U.S. through 27 Nov 2026; the bismuth-specific Announcement No. 10/2025 is not included in the suspension and remains fully in force. | Pillsbury Law, 13 Nov 2025 |
| 19 Dec 2025 | DLA issues follow-on solicitation SP8000-26-R-0009 for an additional 79,380 lb of 99.99% bismuth metal, continuing the stockpile build into FY2026. | Gov Contract Finder, SP8000-26-R-0009 |
| 2026 (current) | China's share of world bismuth production rises to 88%; U.S. bismuth imports from China fall 40% year-on-year to an estimated 460 tons; bismuth remains listed as a Strategic/Critical Raw Material by both USGS and the EU, with no non-Chinese primary bismuth mine in active development. | USGS MCS 2026 bismuth chapter |
What the timeline shows: unlike antimony, gallium, or germanium, bismuth's weaponization was a fast, tariff-triggered add-on rather than a years-in-the-making national-security strategy — MOFCOM added it to the control list in February 2025, two months after the antimony ban, explicitly citing the U.S. tariff dispute. The West's response mirrored that speed: the DLA moved from an executive order in March 2025 to an active stockpile solicitation by August 2025 and a signed IDIQ contract structure by year-end — the fastest U.S. stockpile reconstitution of any of the 2024–2025 controlled minerals, but one aimed purely at buying reserves rather than building a domestic production alternative, because none currently exists.
The refining base — why bismuth has almost no primary mines, and who is trying to build one outside China
Sources: USGS · Fortune Minerals IR · U.S. Department of War · 5N Plus · Korea Zinc · Trafigura/NyrstarAlmost no bismuth is mined for its own sake. Per USGS MCS 2026, bismuth is produced “most often as a byproduct during the processing of lead ores”; in China and Vietnam it also comes out as a byproduct or coproduct of tungsten and other metal ore processing, and in Japan and South Korea as a byproduct of zinc ore processing. The Tasna mine in Bolivia and one mine in China are cited as the only operations anywhere where bismuth is the primary product — everywhere else, bismuth output rises and falls with decisions made about lead, zinc, copper, or tungsten, not about bismuth itself. This byproduct structure is precisely why the metal had no Western stockpile, no dedicated mine-to-metal supply chain, and no fast substitution option when Chinese export licensing hit in 2025.
1. Fortune Minerals' NICO project: the only advanced non-Chinese bismuth-primary development asset
Fortune Minerals' NICO cobalt-gold-bismuth-copper deposit in Canada's Northwest Territories is the rare counter-example: a polymetallic ore body where bismuth is one of four co-equal payable metals rather than a smelter afterthought. The company states NICO hosts 12% of the world's known bismuth reserves, with Mineral Reserves of 33.1 million tonnes containing 102.1 million pounds of bismuth alongside 1.1 million ounces of gold, 82.3 million pounds of cobalt, and 27.2 million pounds of copper (Fortune Minerals, NICO project page). The plan is fully vertically integrated: ore mined and concentrated at NICO in the NWT would ship to a dedicated hydrometallurgical refinery Fortune is developing in Alberta's Industrial Heartland (relocated from an earlier planned site near Saskatoon, Saskatchewan), producing cobalt sulphate, gold doré, 99.99% bismuth ingot and oxide, and copper cement (Fortune Minerals, NICO project page). At steady state the refinery is designed to produce roughly 1,700 tonnes of bismuth ingot annually over a planned ~20-year mine life (Canadian Mining Journal, 2014).
2. The DoD Title III award and the Saskatoon-to-Alberta hydromet path
On 16 May 2024, the U.S. Department of Defense announced a US$6,380,555 (~C$8.74 million) Defense Production Act Title III award to Fortune Minerals — alongside a companion award to graphite developer Lomiko Metals — explicitly “to help support the U.S.-Canadian Joint Action Plan on Critical Minerals,” with the DoD press release stating the funding “supports cobalt sulfate and bismuth metal production capabilities, which is essential for DoD and civilian markets” (U.S. Department of War, 16 May 2024). The Canadian government matched with USD $5.6 million in additional contribution funding through Natural Resources Canada (U.S. Department of War, 16 May 2024). Fortune has stated it was the first Canadian project ever to receive funding under this DoD program, which dates to 1985 (Fortune Minerals CEO Robin Goad, Proactive interview, May 2025). The DPA funds four workstreams: metallurgical test work to optimize the Alberta refinery's hydrometallurgical process, completion of permits for the NICO mine/concentrator in the NWT, permitting for the Alberta refinery site, and an updated feasibility study reflecting the new refinery location and mine plan (Business Wire, 16 May 2024). The refinery site itself moved south over the project's history — originally planned near Langham, Saskatchewan (27 km northwest of Saskatoon) as the “Saskatchewan Metals Processing Plant,” which received Saskatchewan environmental assessment approval in 2014, before Fortune relocated the hydrometallurgical facility to a brownfield site in Alberta's Industrial Heartland near Edmonton to access rail, utilities, and a collaboration with Rio Tinto to co-process waste streams from Rio Tinto's Kennecott smelter in Utah (PR Newswire, 11 Feb 2014; Fortune Minerals CEO interview, May 2024).
3. Timeline to construction: still pre-financing as of mid-2026
By May 2025, Fortune reported that metallurgical validation of the bismuth recovery circuit was “essentially complete,” that Process Design Criteria for bismuth had been finalized and handed to engineering, and that the company had successfully produced high-purity 4N (99.99%) bismuth ingots confirming the commercial viability of its smelting and refining approach, using a ferric-chloride leach-and-cementation circuit (Fortune Minerals, Proactive interview, 20 May 2025). By April 2026, Fortune was pursuing further government funding — applying to Canada's Critical Minerals Infrastructure Fund for up to $50 million toward an access road, and separately responding to a U.S. Department of War Defense Industrial Base Consortium request for proposals aimed specifically at closing “a gap in domestic bismuth production,” which the company notes prioritizes bismuth among thirteen critical minerals given that “China currently controls approximately 90% of refined production” (Fortune Minerals news release, 29 Apr 2026). As of that release, permitting and engineering work was targeted for completion by Q3 2026, with construction still contingent on securing full project financing — meaning NICO remains a pre-construction asset, not yet an operating mine, despite more than $150 million invested to date and over $20 million of combined U.S./Canadian government support (Fortune Minerals, NICO project page).
4. Refining leaders outside China: 5N Plus, Korea Zinc, and the lead/zinc byproduct smelters
5N Plus Inc., headquartered in Saint-Laurent (Montreal), Quebec, is the largest Western processor and refiner of bismuth and bismuth chemicals, describing itself as supplying “over 70% of the world's bismuth chemicals” for pharmaceutical and healthcare applications from its FDA-approved, GMP-certified facility in Lübeck, Germany (5N Plus, 2025 Report on Fighting Forced Labour). 5N Plus does not mine bismuth; it refines and formulates purchased bismuth metal and historically sourced feed from operations such as a Vietnamese bismuth mine (5N Plus, CNW release, 24 Oct 2013), and has periodically adjusted its own refining output relative to purchased metal depending on market conditions (5N Plus, July 2019). In South Korea, Korea Zinc's Onsan smelter is the only producer of antimony, bismuth, and indium in the country, recovering all three as byproducts by circulating and concentrating residues across its integrated zinc, lead, and copper smelting circuits rather than discarding them (Korea Zinc corporate profile). A Korea Zinc technician explained the constraint directly: “indium, antimony and bismuth do not have concentrates. They all come only from extracts of zinc, lead and copper smelting” (ChosunBiz, 8 Mar 2026). Korea Zinc has applied to Korea's Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy to have its integrated byproduct-recovery process designated a National Core Technology, and is separately building a US$7.8 billion smelter complex in Tennessee that would replicate this multi-metal byproduct recovery model on U.S. soil (Asiae, 29 Dec 2025; Seoul Economic Daily, 9 Mar 2026). Elsewhere, Trafigura-owned Nyrstar is exploring bismuth (and tellurium) recovery at its Port Pirie lead smelter in Australia alongside its antimony ramp-up, with government support, while the European Commission's 2023 review of the Umicore-Aurubis Hoboken transaction confirms that lead smelters such as Umicore's Hoboken plant and independent refiner ERS produce bismuth alloy (roughly 80–90% lead, 10–20% bismuth) as a standard byproduct stream from lead refining, which is then sold onward for further bismuth/lead separation (Trafigura/Nyrstar, 17 Feb 2026; European Commission merger decision, Umicore/Aurubis Hoboken).
Beyond defense: the commercial end-use base that keeps bismuth demand structurally hard to substitute
Sources: USGS · 5N Plus · FDA · Ferro/Prince (DCC) · EU RoHS/CRMA · FastmarketsBismuth's defense relevance (Section 4) sits on top of a much larger, decades-old commercial base in pharmaceuticals, fusible alloys, and pigments — uses USGS groups under “chemicals used in cosmetic, industrial, laboratory, and pharmaceutical applications,” plus “ceramic glazes, crystalware, high-performance pigments, and pearlescent pigments,” metallurgical additives, and fusible alloys (USGS MCS 2026). USGS does not publish an exact application-share breakdown for bismuth, but treats these commercial uses as the bulk of apparent consumption, well above the ammunition/electronics defense niche.
1. Pharmaceuticals: bismuth subsalicylate and H. pylori quadruple therapy
Bismuth subsalicylate is the active ingredient in over-the-counter antidiarrheal and gastrointestinal remedies sold under the Pepto-Bismol brand and generics, and in related compounds used to treat burns and stomach ulcers (USGS MCS 2026). Clinically, bismuth compounds (bismuth subsalicylate, bismuth subcitrate, or bismuth potassium citrate) are a core component of quadruple therapy for eradicating Helicobacter pylori infection, typically combined with a proton-pump inhibitor, tetracycline, and metronidazole over a 10–14-day course; the U.S. FDA-approved HELIDAC Therapy regimen (bismuth subsalicylate, metronidazole, and tetracycline hydrochloride) is one such labeled combination (FDA label, HELIDAC Therapy). Peer-reviewed clinical literature describes bismuth's mechanism as interfering with H. pylori nickel homeostasis and inhibiting bacterial urease and protease activity (Current Opinion in Chemical Biology, bioinorganic chemistry of bismuth). 5N Plus's Lübeck, Germany facility, which the company says supplies over 70% of the world's bismuth chemicals, is FDA-approved and GMP-certified specifically to serve this pharmaceutical supply chain (5N Plus, 2025 Forced Labour Report). Because this chain runs on Chinese-origin refined bismuth feedstock even when compounding happens in Germany or elsewhere, the pharmaceutical channel was directly exposed to the 2025 price spike, and USGS's substitutes list for pharmaceutical bismuth uses names only partial alternatives — alumina, antibiotics, calcium carbonate, and magnesia — none of which replicate bismuth's specific antimicrobial and mucosal-protective action (USGS MCS 2026).
2. Low-melting fusible alloys: Field's metal, Rose's metal, and fire-safety triggers
Bismuth's own low melting point (271°C) is compounded further in eutectic alloys with tin, indium, lead, or cadmium to create fusible alloys that melt at or near body temperature to a few hundred degrees. Rose's metal (approximately 50% bismuth, 25% lead, 25% tin) melts around 98–110°C, while Field's metal, a non-toxic bismuth-indium-tin alloy formulated as a lead-free alternative, melts around 60°C (144°F) (Wikipedia, low-melting-point alloy reference table; RotoMetals, Field's Metal product page). These alloys are supplied commercially by firms such as Indium Corporation and Belmont Metals for uses spanning lens-grinding chucks, tube-bending and metal-forming temporary fillers, well-plugging, and soldering (Indium Corporation, fusible alloys). Their best-known safety application is as the triggering mechanism in automatic fire sprinklers: a fusible bismuth-alloy link melts at a designed activation temperature to release the sprinkler valve, a use USGS lists explicitly among bismuth's core applications and for which the only substitute identified is glycerin-filled glass bulbs (USGS MCS 2026).
3. Pigments: bismuth vanadate as the RoHS-era replacement for lead chromate
Bismuth vanadate (BiVO₄, Color Index Pigment Yellow 184) is a bright, opaque, greenish-yellow inorganic pigment that has become the leading commercial replacement for lead chromate ("chrome yellow") and lead-molybdate-chromate pigments in coatings, plastics, and inks. Technical data sheets from major pigment producers — including Ferro's DCC Yellow bismuth vanadate range and Prince (Bruchsaler Farben's Brufasol AL line) — market the pigment specifically as a lead-free, cadmium-free alternative with excellent heat resistance (up to 200–280°C), light fastness, and weather fastness, describing bismuth vanadate's ecotoxicological profile as “the best substitute for yellow pigments containing lead” (Bruchsaler Farben (Prince), Brufasol AL technical data; DCC/pigments.com, Bismuth Vanadate PY.184 technical data sheet). Ferro's technical literature documents continued R&D extending bismuth-based pigment chemistry into the orange spectrum (bismuth oxyhalide, Pigment Orange 85) specifically to broaden the palette of lead- and cadmium-free replacements available to the coatings industry (Ferro, PCI Magazine, October 2021). The regulatory driver is the EU's RoHS Directive 2011/65/EU, which restricts lead (along with mercury, cadmium, hexavalent chromium, and certain brominated flame retardants) to a maximum concentration of 0.1% by weight in homogeneous materials in electrical and electronic equipment, and the EU's End-of-Life Vehicles Directive framework applying similar lead limits to automotive coatings and components (Directive 2011/65/EU (RoHS), consolidated text; Commission Directive 2011/37/EU, End-of-Life Vehicles). Market research estimates total EU consumption of bismuth vanadate yellow pigments at roughly 1,200–1,600 tonnes per year in 2026, valued at approximately €45–65 million at the pigment level, with electronics and electrical equipment accounting for 500–700 tonnes of that volume — directly the product category RoHS governs (IndexBox, EU Bismuth Vanadate Yellow Pigments market analysis, 2026). USGS's own substitutes list for bismuth pigment uses names only partial workarounds — titanium-dioxide-coated mica flakes and fish-scale extracts — for pearlescent effects, not for the opaque yellow/orange color space bismuth vanadate occupies (USGS MCS 2026).
4. Recycling: a structurally thin secondary supply with no formal scrap channel
Unlike lead, copper, or precious metals, bismuth has no established, dedicated scrap-collection and secondary-refining industry. USGS estimates that recycled bismuth-containing alloy scrap composed up to 10% of U.S. apparent bismuth consumption for the years 2021–25 — recovered incidentally as an alloying constituent within lead, solder, or fusible-alloy scrap streams rather than through any bismuth-specific collection and refining system (USGS MCS 2026). There is no LME-listed bismuth scrap grade, no bismuth equivalent of lead-acid battery recycling infrastructure, and no formal end-of-life collection stream for bismuth-bearing pharmaceuticals, pigments, or low-melt alloys once they are dispersed into consumer products; secondary recovery that does occur is a byproduct of lead and copper scrap smelting rather than a purpose-built bismuth recycling loop. This structural gap means that, unlike some other critical minerals where recycling is proposed as a near-term substitute for constrained primary supply, bismuth's 2025 price spike had essentially no offsetting scrap-supply response available to the market.
Mine Production by Country
Source: USGS MCS 2026 · View on TrueAtlas™ →| Country | 2024 | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| United States | — | — |
| Bolivia | 50 | 50 |
| Bulgaria | 48 | 50 |
| China | 14,000 | 14,000 |
| Japan | 500 | 500 |
| Kazakhstan | 180 | 180 |
| Korea, Republic of | 1,000 | 1,000 |
| Laos | 492 | 500 |
| World total (rounded) | 16,300 | 16,000 |
Unit: metric tons. "e" = estimated, "W" = withheld, "NA" = not available. Source: USGS Mineral Commodity Summaries 2026
Commercial Product Forms
Sources: MMTA, USGS MCS 2026 BismuthMajor commercial forms in which this metal is refined, traded and delivered. No LME physical contract for this metal — see Sources for the relevant industry associations and benchmarks.
| Form | Chemical form | Typical grade / spec | Primary end use |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bismuth metal ingot / pin / needle China supplies ≈80% of world refined Bi per USGS MCS 2026 |
Bi, ≥99.99% (4N) |
ASTM B790; MMTA Bi benchmark | Primary traded form; precursor for alloys, chemicals, pharma; Pb-replacement in plumbing brass |
| Bismuth oxide (Bi2O3) | Bi2O3, ≥99.9% |
Electronic-grade ≤50 ppm trace metals | Ceramic capacitors, varistors (ZnO-Bi2O3), high-Tc superconductors (BSCCO) |
| Lead-free solder & fusible alloys | Sn-Bi (42Sn/58Bi), Pb-Bi-Sn fusible (Wood/Field metals) |
Eutectic Sn-Bi mp 138°C; fusibles 47–95°C | Lead-free electronic solder, fusible plugs in sprinklers, low-melt prototyping |
| Bismuth subnitrate / subsalicylate (pharma) | Bi5O(OH)9(NO3)4 / C7H5BiO4 |
USP/EP pharma-grade | Gastrointestinal therapy (Pepto-Bismol active ingredient), cosmetic pearlescent pigments |
| Bismuth scrap (alloy / fusible recovery) | Bi-bearing alloys |
Drosses and turnings from solder production | Secondary smelter feed |
Major Producers (0)
View producer HQs on Atlas →No producer data available for this metal.
Latest News
All metals news →No recent items for Bismuth in this week’s 200-article fetch. Search the full archive → (7,073 items since 13 April 2026).
Insurance & Inspection
Roadmaps, ecosystem & calculatorAll references are to primary sources — Lloyd's, IUMI, IMIA, ICC, ISO, Berne Union, MIGA. No third-party quotes, no fabricated rates. Bismuth-specific risk classes follow the same five-phase lifecycle.