Reserves Producers Chain Ecosystem Regions Compliance Exports Sanctions News Digest
Atlas
Glossary Calc Roadmaps Careers

Approved precious-metals refiners

The bullion that moves through London, New York, Shanghai and Zurich vaults is produced by a small number of refiners whose plants have been audited and approved by the relevant trade association. This page lists every refiner currently on the LBMA Good Delivery List (gold and silver) and the LPPM Good Delivery List (platinum and palladium). A bar accepted by these schemes is "good delivery" worldwide.

Primary sources only Alphabetical within each metal 66 Au · 86 Ag · 38 Pt · 33 Pd Updated 12 June 2026
Neutrality. The four lists below are reproduced from the official LBMA and LPPM rosters. TrueSource Metals Hub does not certify refiners, audit refineries, or endorse any producer's product. Approval, suspension and removal decisions sit entirely with the LBMA Physical Committee and the LPPM Management Committee — see the full Ecosystem neutrality statement.

LBMA Good Delivery — Gold

Every bar tendered against an LBMA-cleared gold contract must originate from a refiner on this list. The Good Delivery standard specifies minimum fineness 995.0, weight 350-430 troy oz, dimensions, and a stamp comprising serial number, fineness mark, year of manufacture and refiner identification.

66 refiners Source: lbma.org.uk · Gold GDL
RefinerCountrySince
1.ABC Refinery (Australia) Pty LtdAustralia04/12/2015
2.Agosi AGGermany08/04/2008
3.Almalyk Mining and Metallurgical Complex (AMMC)Uzbekistan28/10/1997
4.AngloGold Ashanti Mineração LtdaBrazil21/03/1986
5.Argor-Heraeus SASwitzerland28/08/1961
6.ASAHI METALFINE Inc.Japan12/09/2008
7.Asahi Refining Canada LimitedCanada15/06/1961
8.Asahi Refining USA Inc.United States23/05/1989
9.Aurubis AGGermanyPre 1934
10.Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (Central Bank of the Philippines)Philippines06/09/1979
11.Boliden Commercial ABSweden01/01/1984
12.C. Hafner GmbH + Co. KGGermany08/03/2013
13.CCR Refinery - Glencore Canada CorporationCanada~1956
14.Chimet S.p.A.Italy27/07/1996
15.Daye Nonferrous Metals Co., LtdChina09/06/2015
16.Dongwu Gold Group Co., Ltd.China10/11/2019
17.Gold Corporation (T/A The Perth Mint)Australia24/01/2003
18.Great Wall Precious Metals Co., LTD. of CBPMChina02/10/1961
19.Heimerle + Meule GmbHGermany03/06/2014
20.Heraeus Ltd Hong KongHong Kong23/01/2006
21.Inner Mongolia Qiankun Gold and Silver Refinery Share Company LtdChina01/12/1999
22.Ishifuku Metal Industry Co., Ltd.Japan30/06/1982
23.Istanbul Gold RefineryTurkey08/12/2011
24.Italpreziosi S.p.AItaly22/11/2018
25.Japan MintJapan13/12/2007
26.Jiangxi Copper Company LtdChina30/09/2005
27.JX Advanced Metals CorporationJapan03/05/2000
28.Kazzinc LtdKazakhstan20/06/1996
29.Kyrgyzaltyn JSCKyrgyzstan27/10/1999
30.LS MnMSouth Korea20/05/1994
31.Matsuda Sangyo Co., Ltd.Japan11/01/2000
32.Metalor Precious Metals (Suzhou) LimitedChina23/05/2019
33.Metalor Precious Metals Hong Kong LtdHong Kong09/05/2007
34.Metalor Technologies SASwitzerlandPre 1934
35.Metalor Technologies Singapore Pte LtdSingapore17/07/2014
36.Metalor USA Refining CorpUnited States01/01/1987
37.Metalúrgica Met-Mex Peñoles, S.A. de C.V.Mexico22/11/1991
38.Mitsubishi Materials CorporationJapan20/05/1981
39.Mitsui Kinzoku Company, Limited (Takehara)Japan20/05/1981
40.MKS PAMP SASwitzerland10/06/1987
41.MMTC-PAMP India Pvt LtdIndia16/05/2014
42.Nadir Metal Rafineri San. Ve Tic. A.Ş.Turkey08/12/2011
43.Navoi Mining and Metallurgical Combinat (NMMC)Uzbekistan17/10/1994
44.Nihon Material Co., LtdJapan19/12/2013
45.PT Aneka Tambang (Persero) Tbk (Logam Mulia)Indonesia01/01/1999
46.PX Précinox SASwitzerland24/01/2012
47.Rand Refinery (Pty) LtdSouth Africa~1921
48.Royal Canadian MintCanada~1919
49.Sempsa Joyeria Plateria SASpain01/01/1984
50.Shandong Gold Smelting Co., LtdChina14/01/2010
51.Shandong Zhaojin Gold and Silver Refinery Co LtdChina31/12/2007
52.Shenzhen Cuilu Gold Refinery Co., LtdChina12/03/2020
53.Shenzhen Point Gold Refining Co. LtdChina07/08/2023
54.Shenzhen Yuexin Precious Metals Co., LtdChina19/12/2024
55.Sichuan Tianze Precious Metals Co., LtdChina26/03/2013
56.Solar Applied Materials Technology CorpTaiwan25/02/2010
57.Sumitomo Metal Mining Co., Ltd.Japan17/06/1981
58.TANAKA PRECIOUS METAL TECHNOLOGIES Co., Ltd.Japan07/09/1978
59.Tau-Ken AltynKazakhstan19/09/2019
60.TCA S.p.AItaly12/08/2014
61.Tokuriki Honten Co., Ltd.Japan02/07/1981
62.Umicore SA Business Unit Precious Metals RefiningBelgium~1930
63.Valcambi SASwitzerland20/05/1968
64.Yunnan Dianjin Investment Co. LtdChina28/02/2023
65.Zhongyuan Gold Smelter of Zhongjin Gold CorporationChina28/03/2006
66.Zijin Mining Group Gold Smelting Co. LtdChina31/03/2006

LBMA Good Delivery — Silver

Silver Good Delivery bars must be minimum fineness 999.0, weight 750-1100 troy oz (target 1000 oz). Two refiners on the current list are suspended as of 8 May 2026 — flagged inline in the table.

86 refiners Source: lbma.org.uk · Silver GDL
RefinerCountrySince
1.ABC Refinery (Australia) Pty LtdAustralia04/11/2021
2.Agosi AGGermany09/10/1986
3.Almalyk Mining and Metallurgical Complex (AMMC)Uzbekistan23/10/1996
4.Argor-Heraeus SASwitzerland24/06/1992
5.ASAHI METALFINE Inc.Japan17/07/2000
6.Asahi Refining Canada LimitedCanada19/12/2001
7.Asahi Refining USA Inc.United States03/03/1989
8.Aurubis AGGermanyPre 1959
9.Boliden Commercial ABSwedenPre 1959
10.Britannia Refined Metals LtdUnited Kingdom14/04/2005
11.CCR Refinery - Glencore Canada CorporationCanada01/01/1955
12.Chimet S.p.A.Italy18/05/1981
13.Choksi Heraeus Pvt LtdIndia14/11/2024
14.Daye Nonferrous Metals Co., LtdChina05/02/2007
15.Doduco Contacts and Refining GmbHGermany09/08/2012
16.Dowa Metals & Mining Co LtdJapanPre 1959
17.Gold Corporation (T/A The Perth Mint)Australia24/01/2003
18.Great Wall Precious Metals Co., LTD. of CBPMChina1972-1981
19.Guangdong Jinye Precious Metals Co., LtdChina22/11/2018
20.Guangxi Nandan Nanfang Metal Company Ltd SUSPENDED 8 May 2026China01/06/2020
21.Henan Jinli Gold and Lead Group Co., LtdChina14/10/2013
22.Henan Yuguang Gold and Lead Company LtdChina12/11/2002
23.Heraeus Ltd Hong KongHong Kong15/09/2010
24.Heraeus Precious Metals GmbH & Co. KGGermanyPre 1972
25.Hindustan Platinum Pvt. LtdIndia02/11/2016
26.Hindustan Zinc LtdIndia16/04/2018
27.Hunan Guiyang Yinxing Nonferrous Metals Smelting Co LtdChina30/06/2014
28.Hunan Huaxin Rare & Precious Metals Technologies Co., LtdChina30/06/2014
29.Hunan Shuikoushan Nonferrous Metals Group Co Ltd (SKS)China13/05/2003
30.Hunan Silver Co LtdChina17/08/2015
31.Inner Mongolia Qiankun Gold and Silver Refinery Share Company LtdChina06/06/2000
32.Ishifuku Metal Industry Co., Ltd.JapanPre 1934
33.Istanbul Gold RefineryTurkey19/12/2024
34.Italpreziosi S.p.AItaly20/05/2026
35.Japan MintJapanPre 1959
36.Jiangxi Copper Company LtdChina21/04/2004
37.Jiangxi Copper Lead & Zinc Metal Co. LtdChina15/02/2024
38.Jiangxi Hefeng Environmental Protection and Technology Co., Ltd. (Jinfeng)China12/05/2022
39.Jinlong Copper Co., LtdChina10/09/2003
40.Jiyuan Wanyang Smeltery Group Co., LtdChina15/04/2019
41.JX Advanced Metals CorporationJapan01/01/1981
42.Kazakhmys Smelting LLC - Balkhash Metallurgical ComplexKazakhstan21/07/2010
43.Kazzinc LtdKazakhstan14/03/1995
44.Kennecott Utah Copper LLCUnited StatesPre 1959
45.KGHM Polska Miedz SAPoland17/03/1995
46.Korea Zinc Co., LtdSouth Korea30/01/2001
47.LS MnMSouth Korea19/04/1991
48.Matsuda Sangyo Co., Ltd.Japan11/01/2000
49.Metalor Precious Metals Hong Kong LtdHong Kong08/04/2026
50.Metalor Technologies SASwitzerland02/07/1992
51.Metalor USA Refining CorpUnited States18/02/1991
52.Metalúrgica Met-Mex Peñoles, S.A. de C.V.MexicoPre 1959
53.Minshan Environmental Energy High Tech Co., Ltd SUSPENDED 8 May 2026China27/07/2023
54.Mitsubishi Materials CorporationJapanPre 1959
55.Mitsui Kinzoku Company, Limited (Kamioka)JapanPre 1972
56.Mitsui Kinzoku Company, Limited (Takehara)JapanPre 1972
57.MKS PAMP SASwitzerland01/10/1995
58.MMTC-PAMP India Pvt LtdIndia14/10/2013
59.Nadir Metal Rafineri San. Ve Tic. A.Ş.Turkey20/06/2012
60.Planta Recuperadora de Metales SpAChile13/01/2026
61.Rand Refinery (Pty) LtdSouth AfricaPre 1959
62.Remondis PMR B.VNetherlands31/12/2006
63.Royal Canadian MintCanada14/04/2011
64.SAXONIA Edelmetalle GmbHGermany27/01/2014
65.Sempsa Joyeria Plateria SASpainPre 1981
66.Shandong Gold Smelting Co., LtdChina14/01/2010
67.Shandong Humon Smelting Co LtdChina19/07/2018
68.Shandong Zhaojin Gold and Silver Refinery Co LtdChina13/12/2007
69.Shenzhen Cuilu Gold Refinery Co., LtdChina08/05/2024
70.Shenzhen Point Gold Refining Co. LtdChina08/12/2022
71.Shenzhen Yuexin Precious Metals Co., LtdChina21/01/2025
72.Sichuan Tianze Precious Metals Co., LtdChina26/03/2013
73.Solar Applied Materials Technology CorpTaiwan12/06/2008
74.StoneX Metals LtdUnited Kingdom1985
75.Sumitomo Metal Mining Co., Ltd.Japan01/12/2005
76.TANAKA PRECIOUS METAL TECHNOLOGIES Co., Ltd.Japan~1952
77.TCA S.p.AItaly03/10/2017
78.Teck Metals LtdCanadaPre 1959
79.Toho Zinc Co., LtdJapanPre 1959
80.Tokuriki Honten Co., Ltd.Japan11/04/1983
81.Umicore Precious Metals (Thailand) LtdThailand21/11/2014
82.Umicore SA Business Unit Precious Metals RefiningBelgiumPre 1934
83.Valcambi SASwitzerlandPre 1972
84.Yanggu Xiangguang Copper Co., LtdChina05/01/2015
85.Yunnan Copper Co., LtdChina18/03/2004
86.Zijin Copper Co., LtdChina03/08/2017

LPPM Good Delivery — Platinum

Platinum Good Delivery plates and ingots must be minimum fineness 999.5 and weigh between 1 and 6 kg. The current list runs parallel to but separate from the LBMA — some refiners appear on both schemes.

38 refiners Source: lppm.com · Platinum GDL
RefinerCountry
1.Aida Chemical Industries Co. Ltd.Japan
2.Argor-Heraeus SASwitzerland
3.ASAHI METALFINE, Inc.
with effect from 1 April 2023
Japan
4.BASF Metals LLCUnited States
5.C. HAFNER GmbH and Co. KGGermany
6.Chimet SpAItaly
7.Furuya Metal Co. Ltd.Japan
8.Guangdong Jinzhenglong Technology Co., Ltd.China
9.Heesung PM Tech CorpSouth Korea
10.Heraeus LimitedHong Kong
11.Heraeus PGM SA (Pty) LtdSouth Africa
12.Heraeus Precious Metals GmbH & Co. KGGermany
13.Heraeus Precious Metals North America LLCUnited States
14.Hindustan Platinum Pvt. Ltd.India
15.Impala Platinum LimitedSouth Africa
16.Ishifuku Metal Industry Co. LimitedJapan
17.ITP Co., Ltd.China
18.Johnson Matthey Inc.United States
19.Johnson Matthey plcUnited Kingdom
20.Matsuda Sangyo Co. LimitedJapan
21.Metalor Precious Metals (Suzhou) LtdChina
22.Metalor Technologies SASwitzerland
23.MKS PAMP S.A.Switzerland
24.Nihon Material Co. Ltd.Japan
25.Onahama Smelting & Refining Co., Ltd.
formerly Materials Eco-Refining Co. Ltd., effective 1 April 2023
Japan
26.Ravindra Heraeus Private LimitedIndia
27.Rustenburg Platinum Mines LimitedSouth Africa
28.Sabin Metal CorporationUnited States
29.SAXONIA Edelmetalle GmbHGermany
30.Shenzhen Cuilu Gold Refinery Co., LtdChina
31.Shenzhen Point Gold Refining Co., Ltd.China
32.Shenzhen Yuexin Precious Metals Co., Ltd.China
33.Sibanye-Stillwater / Western Platinum (PTY) LimitedSouth Africa
34.Solar Applied Materials Technology Corp.Taiwan
35.T.C.A. S.p.A.Italy
36.TANAKA PRECIOUS METAL TECHNOLOGIES Co., Ltd.Japan
37.Tokuriki Honten Co. LimitedJapan
38.Valcambi SASwitzerland

LPPM Good Delivery — Palladium

Palladium Good Delivery has the same physical specification as platinum (999.5 fineness, 1-6 kg). Several refiners that appear on the platinum list do not refine palladium and vice versa.

33 refiners Source: lppm.com · Palladium GDL
RefinerCountry
1.Aida Chemical Industries Co. Ltd.Japan
2.Argor-Heraeus SASwitzerland
3.ASAHI METALFINE, Inc.
with effect from 1 April 2023
Japan
4.BASF Metals LLCUnited States
5.C. HAFNER GmbH and Co. KGGermany
6.Chimet SpAItaly
7.Furuya Metal Co. Ltd.Japan
8.Heesung PM Tech CorpSouth Korea
9.Heraeus LimitedHong Kong
10.Heraeus PGM SA (Pty) LtdSouth Africa
11.Heraeus Precious Metals GmbH & Co. KGGermany
12.Heraeus Precious Metals North America LLCUnited States
13.Hindustan Platinum Pvt. Ltd.India
14.Ishifuku Metal Industry Co. LimitedJapan
15.Johnson Matthey Inc.United States
16.Johnson Matthey plcUnited Kingdom
17.Matsuda Sangyo Co. LimitedJapan
18.Metalor Technologies SASwitzerland
19.MKS PAMP S.A.Switzerland
20.Nihon Material Co. Ltd.Japan
21.Onahama Smelting & Refining Co., Ltd.
formerly Materials Eco-Refining Co. Ltd., effective 1 April 2023
Japan
22.Ravindra Heraeus Private LimitedIndia
23.Rustenburg Platinum Mines LimitedSouth Africa
24.Sabin Metal CorporationUnited States
25.SAXONIA Edelmetalle GmbHGermany
26.Shenzhen Cuilu Gold Refinery Co., LtdChina
27.Shenzhen Point Gold Refining Co., Ltd.China
28.Shenzhen Yuexin Precious Metals Co., Ltd.China
29.Sibanye-Stillwater / Western Platinum (PTY) LimitedSouth Africa
30.T.C.A. S.p.A.Italy
31.TANAKA PRECIOUS METAL TECHNOLOGIES Co., Ltd.Japan
32.Tokuriki Honten Co. LimitedJapan
33.Valcambi SASwitzerland

How Good Delivery works

1. Application

Refiner submits financial accounts, three years of operation history, technical data on the assay laboratory and proficiency testing results.

2. Sample testing

Candidate provides reference samples (gold, silver or PGM bars) which are independently assayed by existing Good Delivery refiners.

3. Site visit

LBMA / LPPM technical assessors visit the refinery, audit the assay lab, and verify production capability and quality systems.

4. Listing

The Physical Committee (LBMA) or Management Committee (LPPM) votes on inclusion. The refiner's bars become "good delivery" at participating vaults worldwide.

5. Pro-Active Monitoring (PAM)

Once listed, refiners are reviewed every three years on assay accuracy via blind testing of submitted bars by other Good Delivery refiners.

6. Responsible Sourcing

All LBMA Good Delivery refiners must comply with the LBMA Responsible Sourcing Guidance (RSG), aligned with the OECD Due Diligence framework.

Primary sources

Last updated: 2026-07-09

Good Delivery Accreditation Under Pressure — Delistings, Sanctions, and the Incident Review Process

The LBMA's Good Delivery List is a private-sector gatekeeper with public-policy consequences. Since 2022 it has been used as a geopolitical sanctions instrument as much as a technical quality standard, while a slow but steady drumbeat of delistings — eight refiners removed between 2015 and 2024 — shows the accreditation system's enforcement teeth are real, if opaque.

1. The scale of the list and the delisting record, 2015–2024

As of mid-2025 the LBMA accredits 66 gold refiners and 79 silver refiners across roughly 37 countries, forming the backbone of the London Good Delivery bar standard that underpins global loco-London settlement (LBMA-derived directory of accredited refineries, July 2025). A confidential submission compiled for the UN Special Procedures mechanism documents that eight refiners were removed from the Good Delivery List during 2015–2024 for failing to meet required standards, with three of those removals following a formal Incident Review Process that identified “zero tolerance” risks (UN Special Procedures communication on LBMA Good Delivery List refiners). The Incident Review Process itself is triggered when the LBMA becomes aware of allegations of criminal activity or potential serious breaches of the Responsible Gold Guidance, and can escalate into a Special Audit conducted by an auditor independent of the refiner's original assurance provider — though the LBMA's own stated starting point is that disengagement should be a “last resort,” used only where adverse impact is irremediable (UN Special Procedures communication on LBMA Good Delivery List refiners). MMTC-PAMP's 2019 Incident Review Process over sourcing linked to Tanzania's North Mara Mine — and Rand Refinery's later contract with the same mine — illustrate how the process runs in practice: repeated assurance reviews, confidential on-site assessments, and a conclusion that sourcing could continue subject to mitigation rather than an automatic delisting (UN Special Procedures communication on LBMA Good Delivery List refiners).

2. Russia's 2022 suspension: the sanctions precedent that reshaped the list

The most consequential Good Delivery action of the decade came on 7 March 2022, when the LBMA suspended all six Russian gold and silver refineries then on its accredited lists — JSC Krastsvetmet, JSC Novosibirsk Refinery, JSC Uralelectromed, Moscow Special Alloys Processing Plant, Prioksky Plant of Non-Ferrous Metals, and Shyolkovsky Factory of Secondary Precious Metals — in direct response to US, EU, and UK sanctions following Russia's invasion of Ukraine (Bloomberg, Russian Gold Is Hit With De Facto Ban From Key London Market). Bars produced before the suspension date remained valid Good Delivery, but no new production from those refiners could enter the London market (Reuters, London bullion market bars Russian gold refineries). Strikingly, the parallel London Platinum and Palladium Market (LPPM) took the opposite stance on its own two Russian-accredited refiners, JSC Krastsvetmet and the Prioksky Plant, explicitly stating “there will be no changes to our good delivery list” — reflecting Russia's outsized share of global palladium supply and the absence of platinum-group-metals sanctions at the time (Euronews, London market green-lights Russia's palladium while blocking its gold). The episode set a template later governments have referenced when weighing sanctions on refiner accreditation as a targeted, market-structure-level enforcement tool rather than a blunt trade embargo.

3. The Kaloti/DMCC precedent and its echo in later UAE suspensions

Years before the LBMA's Russia action, the Dubai Multi Commodities Centre's 2015 removal of Al Kaloti Jewellers Factory from the Dubai Good Delivery list established the template for reputational accreditation risk in the Gulf refining hub. DMCC delisted Kaloti's Sharjah refinery on 5 April 2015 for failing to meet its responsible-sourcing practical guidance, after a leaked 2013 Ernst & Young audit had identified serious breaches, including the import of gold-painted silver bars from Morocco that investigators characterized as a method of circumventing export controls (Bloomberg, Dubai's Kaloti Removed From Gold List as New Factory Near). Global Witness later reported that Switzerland's Valcambi continued sourcing directly from Kaloti — some 16.5 tonnes in 2018 and four tonnes in 2019 — despite Kaloti's non-LBMA status and links documented by investigators to Sudanese conflict gold, underscoring how delisting from one accreditation body does not necessarily sever a refiner from downstream Good Delivery-adjacent supply chains (Global Witness, How Switzerland's Valcambi Sources from UAE's Kaloti). The precedent recurred in 2023, when the UAE suspended Emirates Gold DMCC — one of the Gulf's largest refiners, operating for over 30 years — from its national Good Delivery list on 7 July 2023 over concerns the owners had alleged ties to money laundering, with the LBMA following suit by suspending Emirates Gold's affiliate membership the same week (The National, UAE suspends Emirates Gold refinery from its 'good delivery list').

Current status (July 2026): All six 2022-suspended Russian refiners remain off the LBMA Good Delivery List with no indication of reinstatement; the Incident Review Process continues to function as a case-by-case remediation track rather than an automatic-delisting mechanism. Watch: whether geopolitical sanctions extend to platinum-group-metals accreditation as they have to gold and silver, and whether further Gulf refiner suspensions follow the Kaloti/Emirates Gold pattern.
Last updated: 2026-07-09

Responsible Gold Guidance Version 10 — the LBMA's Transparency Overhaul Reaches Public Consultation

The LBMA is moving from confidential annual assurance to public, mine-level supply-chain disclosure — on an accelerated timeline. Reporting originally targeted for 2027 was pulled forward to January 2026, and a full Version 10 rewrite of the Responsible Gold Guidance is now in public consultation, drawing direct civil-society critique of its enforcement gaps.

1. From Version 9 to Version 10: what changed and why

The current baseline standard, Responsible Gold Guidance version 9 (RGG9), finalized in November 2021, follows the OECD's five-step due-diligence framework and requires refiners to address money laundering, terrorist financing, human-rights abuses, and environmental harm, verified through annual third-party assurance (LBMA, Responsible Sourcing Programme publications). On 15 June 2026 the LBMA launched public consultation on Responsible Gold Guidance version 10 (RGG10), a review the organization says has been under development since 2024 through stakeholder working groups, task forces, and committee input from GDL refiners, assurance providers, and civil society. RGG10's four focus areas are: sharper risk-based due diligence for what it renames “Secondary Gold” (formerly Recycled Gold); formal incorporation of the Artisanal and Small-Scale Mining (ASM) Toolkit and Disclosure Guidance updates; broader ESG due-diligence expectations; and continued alignment with the EU Conflict Minerals Regulation, an alignment RGG9 already achieved as a recognized industry scheme (LBMA, Public Consultation Launch: Responsible Gold Guidance Version 10).

2. The accelerated Disclosure Guidance: mine-level reporting from January 2026

Ahead of RGG10's full rollout, the LBMA fast-tracked a separate Disclosure Guidance update that took effect 1 January 2026, requiring refiners to publicly disclose the identity of the refiner and local exporter in OECD-defined “red flag locations,” all World Gold Council-member mines from which they receive material, and all countries from which mined material is sourced — a requirement the LBMA describes as the first industry scheme of its kind to implement disclosures under Footnote 59 of the OECD's Gold Supplement guidance (LBMA, consultation update on Disclosure Guidance and Footnote 59 requirements). The underlying reporting infrastructure, the Gold Bar Integrity Database launched in January 2025, is set to take monthly country-of-origin submissions from refiners on a voluntary basis from April 2026, becoming mandatory monthly reporting from 2027 — a hard compliance deadline with real consequences, since LBMA CEO Ruth Crowell has confirmed non-compliant refiners face suspension or delisting from the Good Delivery List once the mandate takes effect (Reuters, LBMA's new database for gold bars will be mandatory for listed refineries from 2027).

3. Civil-society pushback: Human Rights Watch's July 2026 consultation submission

Human Rights Watch's formal submission to the RGG10 consultation, filed 8 July 2026, argues the “red flag locations” concept as operationalized in the Disclosure Guidance is too narrow, relying on country lists — including the EU Conflict Minerals Regulation list and current/former FATF high-risk lists — that omit countries such as Peru, Brazil, and Ghana despite each meeting several OECD criteria for high-risk sourcing, and that exclude the UAE entirely following its removal from the FATF grey list in 2024, notwithstanding documented human-rights concerns tied to the jurisdiction's role as a global gold-trade hub (Human Rights Watch, Submission to the LBMA Re. Responsible Gold Guidance Version 10). The submission's sharpest institutional criticism targets the Incident Review Process itself: the guidance does not clarify what constitutes a “serious breach,” how allegations can be filed by external parties, what timeframe applies, or — most consequentially — whether an Incident Review Process or Special Assurance can actually trigger suspension or expulsion from the Good Delivery List, with Human Rights Watch citing both an EU finding and its own identified case of non-conformances that produced no consequence (Human Rights Watch, Submission to the LBMA Re. Responsible Gold Guidance Version 10). The group's core recommendation is full supply-chain transparency — disclosure of all mines of origin and all direct and indirect suppliers, including secondary-gold suppliers, ideally through a searchable public database such as Open Supply Hub, rather than confidential reporting to the LBMA alone (Human Rights Watch, Submission to the LBMA Re. Responsible Gold Guidance Version 10).

Current status (July 2026): RGG10 remains in open public consultation as of July 2026, with the accelerated Disclosure Guidance already binding since January 2026 and full Gold Bar Integrity Database reporting mandatory from 2027. Watch: the consultation's close date and final RGG10 text, whether the LBMA responds to civil-society critique of red-flag-location scope, and enforcement transparency once mandatory monthly reporting begins in 2027.
Last updated: 2026-07-09

Refining Capacity Realignment — Swiss Corporate Restructuring Meets Asian and US Tariff Pressure

The Swiss refining cluster that has dominated Good Delivery bar output for decades is restructuring under both ownership and tariff pressure, even as Hong Kong's two LBMA-accredited refiners and Japan's Tanaka Kikinzoku anchor a growing Asian refining and recycling footprint.

1. Swiss refiner concentration: four plants, one triangle, one merger

Switzerland's four major LBMA-accredited gold refiners — Valcambi (Balerna), PAMP (Castel San Pietro), Argor-Heraeus (Mendrisio), and Metalor (Neuchâtel) — together process roughly a third of global gold supply, with three of the four clustered within a few kilometres of each other in the Ticino canton near the Swiss-Italian border (Mining.com, Swiss gold refineries reopen as virus lockdown eases). Consolidation has been underway for a decade: Valcambi was acquired by India's Rajesh Exports in 2015 from a group that included US miner Newmont, PAMP merged formally with parent trading house MKS in November 2021 to form MKS PAMP SA, and Heraeus completed its acquisition of Argor-Heraeus in 2017 (BullionStar, Swiss Gold Refinery Argor-Heraeus to be Acquired). That consolidation reached a new corporate milestone on 1 July 2026, when Argor-Heraeus began operating as an independent company within the Heraeus Group, following Heraeus Precious Metals' split into two distinct operating entities — with Argor-Heraeus now consolidating all Heraeus Group activity in luxury and investment precious metals under a standalone structure rather than as a business line (Argor-Heraeus, Argor-Heraeus Becomes an Independent Operating Company Within Heraeus Group). Capacity remains heavily concentrated: Valcambi alone runs roughly 1,500–1,600 tonnes of annual gold refining capacity, with Metalor around 800 tonnes, PAMP over 450 tonnes, and Argor-Heraeus over 400 tonnes — together with Heraeus and Tanaka Kikinzoku, these seven refinery groups combine for close to 5,000 tonnes of annual gold refining capacity worldwide (BullionStar, The World's Largest Precious Metals Refineries).

2. Tariff-driven relocation pressure: the Swiss-US trade agreement's gold-smelting clause

US Section 232 tariff escalation has begun to reshape where Swiss refiners consider locating capacity. A bilateral Swiss-US Trade Agreement finalized 14 November 2025 reduced US tariffs on Swiss goods from 39% to 15% in exchange for a Swiss commitment to invest roughly $200 billion across various US industries, explicitly naming “gold smelting” (refining) as a targeted sector — a direct response to earlier tariff-driven uncertainty that had prompted Valcambi, PAMP, Argor-Heraeus, and Metalor to at least evaluate US operations despite initial resistance over cost and the difficulty of replicating specialized Swiss refining expertise domestically (Chronicle-Journal, Swiss Gold Refiners Eye U.S. Shores Amidst Tariff Tensions and New Trade Deal). Separately, the White House's April 2026 restructuring of Section 232 metals tariffs applied tiered ad valorem rates of up to 50% on aluminium, steel, and most copper articles and their derivatives, with a reduced-rate framework under Annex III expiring 31 December 2027 — while a February 2026 presidential proclamation on a broader import surcharge explicitly carved out “metals used in currency and bullion” from the new levy, underscoring that investment-grade bullion continues to receive distinct tariff treatment relative to industrial base metals even as the Section 232 regime tightens elsewhere (The White House, Imposing a Temporary Import Surcharge to Address Fundamental International Payments Problems).

3. Asian refinery growth: Hong Kong's dual accreditation and Japan's Tanaka

Two LBMA Good Delivery-listed gold refineries already operate inside Hong Kong — German group Heraeus (Fanling) and Swiss group Metalor (Kwai Chung) — each with annual gold-refining capacity of roughly 200 tonnes, positioning the territory as a processing bridge between the London/Zurich system and mainland Chinese demand (Bastille Post, Hong Kong is All That Glitters With a New Super Gold Vault). In Japan, Tanaka Kikinzoku Kogyo — one of the seven LBMA Good Delivery referee refiners alongside the four major Swiss houses, Rand Refinery, and Metalor — runs roughly 500 tonnes of annual gold refining capacity and has been actively expanding its precious-metals recycling network, including new capacity for consolidating jewelry and electronic scrap ahead of refining, a category the LBMA's Disclosure Guidance now separately tracks as material handled by “intermediate refiners” (Tanaka Precious Metals, Tanaka Precious Metals to Establish Global Recycling Network). China's own refining base has scaled dramatically, with 15 gold refiners now on the LBMA's Good Delivery List — more than any single country other than Japan — including Zijin Mining, Shandong Gold Smelting, and Jiangxi Copper, reflecting Beijing's push to bring domestic refining capacity up to international accreditation standards alongside the Shanghai Gold Exchange's certified-vault network (LBMA-derived directory of accredited refineries, July 2025).

Current status (July 2026): Swiss refining capacity remains dominant but corporately fragmenting under new ownership structures and tariff-driven relocation pressure, while Hong Kong, Japan, and China collectively represent the fastest- growing accredited refining base outside Switzerland. Watch: whether any Swiss refiner commits to a physical US facility under the November 2025 trade agreement, and whether China's refiner count on the Good Delivery List continues to grow relative to legacy European and North American accreditations.